Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:38:22.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Enhanced Photoresponse at Dislocation Subgrain Boundaries Revealed by X-Ray Topography of Polysilicon Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S.M. Johnson
Affiliation:
Solarex Corporation, Rockville, MD 20850
R.W. Armstrong
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
R.G. Rosemeier
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
G.M. Storti
Affiliation:
Solarex Corporation, Rockville, MD 20850
H.C. Lin
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
W.F. Regnault
Affiliation:
Semix, Incorporated, Gaithersburg, MD 20760
Get access

Abstract

An enhanced photoresponse at dislocation subgrain boundaries (in comparison with grain boundaries and dislocation-associated twin boundaries) is attributed to an increased junction depth at their positions relative to the value of the minority carrier diffusion length, Ln. For reasonably pure material, Ln is determined by the dislocation density. The dislocation microstructure of polysilicon solar cells is advantageously studied by means of the several x-ray topography techniques.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Work supported by Semix, Incorporated under DOE Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC01-80ET 23197.

References

REFERENCES

1. Armstrong, R.W., Taylor, M.E., Storti, G.M., Johnson, S.M., Proc. 14th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., 196, (1980).Google Scholar
2. Johnson, S.M., Rosemeier, R.G., Wang, C.D., Armstrong, R.W., Lin, H.C., Storti, G.M., Proc. IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting, 202, (1980).Google Scholar
3. Rosemeier, R.G., Armstrong, R.W., Johnson, S.M., Storti, G.M., C. Cm. Wu, Proc. 15th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., 1331, (1981).Google Scholar
4. Armstrong, R.W., in The Characterization of Crystal Growth Defects by X-Ray Methods, Eds. Bowen, D.K. and Tanner, B.K. (Plenum, London, 1980) p. 349.Google Scholar
5. Rosemeier, R.G., U. of MD, Inst. Phys. Sci. and Tech., Elect. Micr. Cent. Fac. Newsletter, Iss. 9, p. 9, (1981);Google Scholar
unpublished result obtained with Lord, D.G., University of Salford, U.K.Google Scholar
6. Faust, J.W. Jr., John, H.F., J. Electrochem, Soc. 108, 855, (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Derossi, B.G., Ames, P.J., Armstrong, R.W., Regnault, W.F., in ref 5, p. 6.Google Scholar
8. Noeller, P.M., Armstrong, R.W., Rosemeier, R.G., Taylor, M.E., Johnson, S.M., Regnault, W.F., U. of MD, Inst. Phys. Sci. and Tech., Elec. Micr. Cent. Fac. Newsletter, Iss. 10, (1981), in print.Google Scholar
9. Armstrong, R.W., Boettinger, W.J., Kuriyama, M., J. Appl. Cryst. 13, 223, (1980).Google Scholar
10. Vogel, F.L. Jr., Acta. Met. 3, 245, (1955).Google Scholar
11. Yang, K, Schwuttke, G.H., Ciszek, T.F., J. Crystal Growth 50, 301, (1980).Google Scholar
12. Labusch, R., Schröter, W., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 23, London, 56, (1975).Google Scholar
13. Hirsch, P.B., in Defects in Semiconductors, Eds. Narayan, J. and Tan, T.Y. (North Holland, N.Y., 1981) p. 257.Google Scholar
14. Mataré, H.F., Solid State Elec. 22, 651, (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Storti, G.M., Johnson, S.M., Lin, H.C., Wang, C.D., in ref. 1, p. 191.Google Scholar
16. Rosemeier, R.G., Yool, K.C., U. of MD, unpublished research (10/1981).Google Scholar
17. Storti, G.M., in ref. 3, p. 442.Google Scholar