Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:42:17.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adhesion-Based Capture and Separation of Cells for Microfluidic Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Wesley C. Chang ,
Luke P. Lee  and
Dorian Liepmann
Wesley C. Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering Berkeley Sensor and Actuator Center, 497 Cory Hall University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1774, USA
Luke P. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering Berkeley Sensor and Actuator Center, 497 Cory Hall University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1774, USA
Dorian Liepmann
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering Berkeley Sensor and Actuator Center, 497 Cory Hall University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1774, USA
Get access

Abstract

Cell separation and sorting in micro-assay devices must be performed using minimal sample sizes and few processing steps. To meet these requirements, a biomimetic approach to cell sorting is proposed based on adhesive rolling of cells along surfaces. This type of interaction is mediated by a special class of adhesion proteins on cell membranes and is responsible for localizing cells to particular tissues in vivo. To perform cell capture in a microdevce, raw sample can be flowed through microstructured fluidic channels, which serve as chromatographic “separation columns” and whose surfaces are coated with adhesion proteins. Targeted cells are captured by the flow structures and are permitted to roll slowly under shear from passing fluid. Among captured cells, differences in rolling speed provide the basis for segregating different populations. In this study, two prospective designs for microstructured fluidic channels were coated with E-selectin IgG chimera. The capture and enrichment of HL-60 and U-937 cells from flowing samples were demonstrated. Additionally, the difference in transit speed through one of the fluidic channels indicates that separation of enriched populations of these cells is feasible.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 729: Symposium U – MEMS and BioMEMS , 2002 , U4.5
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Petersen, K.E., et al., “Toward next generation clinical diagnostic instruments: scaling and new processing paradigms”. J Biomed Microdev, 1998. 1(1): p. 71–79.Google Scholar
2. Cell separation methods and applications, ed. Recktenwald, D. and Radbruch, A.. 1998, New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
3. Bakajin, O.C., R.; Chou, C.F.; Chan, S.S.; Gabel, C.; Knight, J.; Cox, T.; Austin, R.H. “Sizing, fractionation and mixing of biological objects via microfabricated devices”. in Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Technical Digest Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop. 1998. Hilton Head, SC, USA.Google Scholar
4. Carlson, R.H., et al., “Activation and sorting of human white blood cells” Biomed Microdev, 1998. 1(1): p. 39–47.Google Scholar
5. Fu, A., et al., “A microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorter” Nature Biotech, 1999. 17(11): p. 1109–1111.Google Scholar
6. Choi, J.-W., Liakopoulos, T.M., and Ahn, C., “An on-chip magnetic bead separator using spiral electromagnets with semi-encapsulated permalloy” Biosensors Bioelectr., 2001. 16: p. 409–416.Google Scholar
7. Chronis, N., Lam, W., and Lee, L.P.. “A microfabricated bio-magnetic separator based on continuous hydrodynaic parallel flow”. in micro-TAS 2001. 2001. Monterey, CA, USA.Google Scholar
8. Aigner, S., et al., “CD24 mediates rolling of breast carcinoma cells on P-selectin”. FASEB J, 1998. 12: p. 1241–1251.Google Scholar
9. Mazo, I., et al., “Hematopoietic progenitor cell rolling in bone marrow microvessels: parallel contributions by endothelial selectins and vascualr cell adhesion molecule 1” J Exp Med, 1998. 188(3): p. 465–474.Google Scholar
10. Reinhardt, P.H. and Kubes, P., “Differential leukocyte recruitment from whole blood via endothelial adhesion molecules under shear conditions”. Blood, 1998. 92(12): p. 4691–4699.Google Scholar
11. Brunk, D.K. and Hammer, D.A., “Quantifying rolling adhesion with a cell-free assay: E-selectin and its carbohydrate ligands”. Biophys J, 1997. 72: p. 2820–2833.Google Scholar