Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:34:44.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yield Point Phenomena and Dislocation Velocities Underneath Indentations Into BCC Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

W. W. Gerberich ,
S. Venkataraman ,
J. Nelson ,
H. Huang ,
E. Lilleodden  and
W. Bonin
W. W. Gerberich
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455
S. Venkataraman
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455
J. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455
H. Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455
E. Lilleodden
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455
W. Bonin
Affiliation:
Hysitron, Inc., Minneapolis, MN 55413
Get access

Abstract

In a single material, hardnesses can range from 3σys up to the theoretical strength or approximately E/10 where σys and E are tensile yield strength and modulus. This variation results with decreasing depth of penetration. Such indentation size effects may be associated with surface contamination, passivation films and dislocation phenomena. Even where dislocation nucleation is relatively difficult as in GaAs, the hardness varies from about 1.5 to 15 GPa as the indentation depth decreased from about 100 nm to 10 nm. Similar size effects in BCC metals can give hardnesses which range from about 1 to 30 GPa as the indentations decrease from 1000 nm to 10 nm. Here, there are two types of “yield” phenomena which can be related to an organic contamination film and a dislocation pile-up induced oxide film fracture. As measured in single crystals of Fe, Mo, W, Ta and NiAl, this typically gives lower and upper “yield” points which range from 0.6 to 10 raN. When a dislocation pile-up breaks through the oxide film, velocities can be reasonably large due to the stress at the head of the pile-up. The average dislocation velocity of this avalanche is controlled, to first order, by the Peierls’ energy. A more exhaustive study of NiAl, with a B2/BCC type crystal structure shows that dislocation velocity can be related to the local pile-up stress and a Peierls’ barrier of about 2.2 eV.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 356: Symposium B2 – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V , 1994 , 629
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Wu, T.W., Hwang, C., Lo, J. and Alexopoulos, P.S., Thin Solid Films 166, 299 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7,1 564 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Bell, T.J., Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V., MRS Proceedings 299, 331 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Venkataraman, S.K., Kohlstedt, D.L. and Gerberich, W.W., J. Mater. Res. 8, 685 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Gerberich, W.W., Venkataraman, S.K., Huang, H., Harvey, S.E. and Kohlstedt, D.L., Acta Metall. et Mater., in press (1995).Google Scholar
7. Gane, N. and Bowden, F.P., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1432 (1968).Google Scholar
8. Pethica, J.B. and Tabor, D., Surface Science 89, 182 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Venkataraman, S.K., PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota (1994).Google Scholar
10. Clarke, D.R., Kroll, M.C., Kirchner, P.D., Cook, R.F. and Hockey, B.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2156 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Page, T.F., Oliver, W.C. and McHargue, Carl J., J. Mater. Res. 7, 450 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Boldt, P.H., Embury, J.D. and Weatherly, G.C., Mat. Sci. and Engng. A155 251 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Yeomans, J.A. and Page, T.F., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 2312 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Mann, A.B., Pethica, J.B., Nix, W.D. and Tomiya, S., MRS Fall ‘94 Symposium B2, This Proceedings (1995).Google Scholar
15. Lilleodden, E.T., Bonin, W., Nelson, J., Wyrobek, J.T. and Gerberich, W.W., submitted J. Mater. Res. Rapid Commun. (1995).Google Scholar
16. Harvey, S., Huang, H., Venkataraman, S. and Gerberich, W.W., J. Mater. Res. 8, 1291 (1993).Google Scholar
17. Zielinski, W., Huang, H. and Gerberich, W.W., J. Mater. Res. 8, 1300 (1993).Google Scholar
18. Huang, H., Venkataraman, S. and Gerberich, W.W., unpublished data (1994).Google Scholar
19. Hahn, G., private communication, Vanderbilt University (1994).Google Scholar
20. Hertz, H., J. Mathematik 92, 156 (1882).Google Scholar
21. Johnson, K.L., Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985).Google Scholar
22. Conrad, H., in High-Strength Materials (ed. by Zackay, V.F., J. Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1964) p. 482.Google Scholar
23. Lilleodden, E.T., Bonin, W., Nelson, J., Wyrobek, J.T. and Gerberich, W.W., in preparation.Google Scholar
24. Gall, P., Acta Metall. 35, No. 1, 143 (1987).Google Scholar