Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:45:11.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray Detection on Fe-H Vibrations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Hongxin Wang ,
Yisong Guo ,
Saeed Kamali  and
Stephen P Cramer
Hongxin Wang
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Applied Science, Davis, California, United States
Yisong Guo
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Applied Science, Davis, California, United States
Saeed Kamali
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Applied Science, Davis, California, United States
Stephen P Cramer
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Applied Science, Davis, California, United States
Get access

Abstract

X-ray detection on hydrogen related events is difficult due to its extremely small scattering factor. In this report, we have used nuclear resonance vibrational spectroscopy (NRVS) to examine the nature of the Fe–H vibrational modes in several FeH model complexes, which shines light on the possible measurements on the Fe-H vibrations inside real biological systems in the future.

Keywords

Mössbauer effectenergy generationenergy storage
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1262: Symposium V/W – In-Situ and operando Probing of Energy Materials at Multiscale Down to Single Atomic Couumn-The Powerof X-Rays, Neutons and Electrons Microscopy , 2010 , 1262-W07-10
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lubitz, W., Reijerse, E. and Gastel, M. van. Chem. Rev Rev. 107, 4331 (2007).Google Scholar
2 Wang, H., Ralston, C., Patil, D., Jones, R., Gu, W., Verhagen, M., Adams, M., Ge, P. etc., and Cramer, S. P., J. Am. Chem. Soc, 122, 10544 (2000).Google Scholar
3 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science - Biohydrogen Production (October 28, 2009), from website: http://genomicsgtl.energy.gov/benefits/biohydrogen.shtmlGoogle Scholar
4 Charvin, P., Abanades, S., Lemort, F., and Flamant, G., Energy & Fuels 21, 2919 (2007).Google Scholar
5 Huanga, Z., Guoa, Z., Calkab, A., Wexlerb, D., Lukeyc, C. Lu and Liua, H., keyc J. Alloys & Compounds 422, 299 (2006).Google Scholar
6 Smith, M., Xiao, Y., Wang, H., George, S., Coucouvanis, D., Koutmos, M., Sturhahn, W., Alp, E., Zhao, J., Cramer, S., Inorg. Chem Chem., 44, 5562 (2005).Google Scholar
7 Xiao, Y., Wang, H., George, S., Smith, M., Adams, M., Jenney, F. Je, Sturhahn, W., Alp, E., Zhao, J., Yoda, Y., Dey, A., Solomon, E., Cramer, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128, 7608 (2006)Google Scholar
8 Bergmann, U., Sturhahn, W., Linn, D., Jenney, F., Adams, M., Rupnik, K., Hales, B., Cramer, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc, 125, 4016 (2003).Google Scholar
9 Pelmenschiko, V., Guo, Y., Wang, H., Cramer, S. P., Case, D. A., Faraday Discuss. Accepted (2010).Google Scholar
10 Cramer, S., Xiao, Y., Wang, H., Guo, Y., Smith, M., Hyperfine Interact 170, 47 (2006).Google Scholar