Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:52:56.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wet and Dry Etching Characteristics of Electron Beam Deposited SiO and SiO2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. R. LaRoche ,
F. Ren ,
J. R. Lothian ,
J. Hong ,
S. J. Pearton  and
E. Lambers
J. R. LaRoche
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
F. Ren
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
J. R. Lothian
Affiliation:
Multiplex Inc., South Plainfield, NJ 07080
J. Hong
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
S. J. Pearton
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
E. Lambers
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the thermal stability and etching characteristics of E-beam deposited SiO and SiO2. Dry etch rates were studied using SF6 and NF3 discharges in a Plasma Therm inductively coupled plasma system. Wet etch rates were assessed with buffered HF and HF/H2O solutions. SiO2 etched faster than SiO under all etch conditions. Dry etch rate of SiO2 was comparable with PECVD SiO2. Auger analysis indicated that SiO2 maintained excellent thermal stability after annealing to 700°C. The Si/O ratio of SiO in the film increased when annealed to 700°C. Ellipsometry also revealed greater refractive index variance across the sample for SiO, as compared to SiO2. However, thickness variation of both films was ≤ 2% across the wafer. Ellipsometry data also showed great thermal stability of SiO and SiO2. There was <4% change after 700°C annealing.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 573: Symposium Z – Compound Semiconductor Surface Passivation and Novel Device.. , 1999 , 259
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pearton, S.J., Abernathy, C.R., Hobson, W.S., Ren, F., Fullowan, T.R., Lopata, J. and Chakrabarti, U. K., Materials Science and Engineering, B13, p. 171 (1992)Google Scholar
2. Pearton, S.J., Appl. Phys. A43, p. 153 (1987)Google Scholar
3. Johnson, N.M., Doland, C., Ponce, F., Walker, J. and Anderson, G., Physica B, 170, p.3 (1991)Google Scholar
4. LaRoche, J. R., Ren, F., Lothian, J.R., Hong, J., Pearton, S.J., and Lambers, E., The Use of Amorphous SiO and SiO2 to Passivate AuGe Based Contacts for GaAs Ics, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, in press 5. Higashi, G., The Physics and Chemistry of SiO2 and the Si-SiC 2 Interface 2, p. 187 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Pivot, Thin Solid Films, 89, p. 175 (1982)Google Scholar
7. Chao, P. C., Smith, P. M., Wanuga, S., Perkins, W. H., and Wolf, E. D., IEEE Electron Dev. Lett., EDL–4, p. 326 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Wu, C. S., Ren, F., Pearton, S. J., Hu, M., Pao, C. K., and Wang, R. F., IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 42, p. 1419 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Ren, F., Emerson, A. B., Scarpelli, V. J., Pearton, S. J., and Brown, J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, p. 1030 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Hagio, M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 140, p. 2402 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Strifler, W. and Yeung, W., 1994 US Conf. On GaAs Man. Tech., Las Vegas, NV, p.155.Google Scholar