Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:03:44.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triple-Shape Capability of Thermo-sensitive Nanocomposites from Multiphase Polymer Networks and Magnetic Nanoparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Narendra Kumar Uttamchand ,
Karl Kratz ,
Marc Behl  and
Andreas Lendlein
Narendra Kumar Uttamchand
Affiliation:
[email protected], Center for Biomaterial Development, Institute for Polymer Research, GKSS Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Kantstrasse 55, Teltow, 14513, Germany, 0049 3328 352 248, 0049 3328 352 452
Karl Kratz
Affiliation:
[email protected], Center for Biomaterial Development, Institute for Polymer Research, GKSS Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH, Head of the Analytics Department, Teltow, Germany
Marc Behl
Affiliation:
[email protected], Center for Biomaterial Development, Institute for Polymer Research, GKSS Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH, Head of Active Polymers Department, Teltow, Germany
Andreas Lendlein
Affiliation:
[email protected], United States
Get access

Abstract

Thermo-sensitive multiphase polymer networks with triple-shape capability have been recently introduced as a new class of active polymers that can change on demand from a first shape A to a second shape B and from there to a permanent shape C. Such multiphase polymer networks consist of covalent cross-links that determine shape C and at least two phase-segregated domains with distinct thermal transitions Ttrans,A and Ttrans,B , that are associated to shape A and B. In general the application of a two step programming or a one step programming procedure is required for creation of triple-shape functionality. In this study we report about a series of CLEGC nanocomposites consisting of silica coated nanoparticles (SNP) incorporated in a multiphase graft polymer network matrix from crystallisable poly(ε-caprolactone) diisocyanatoethyl methacrylate (PCLDIMA) and poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether monomethacrylate (PEGMA) forming crystallisable side chains. These CLEGC nanocomposites were designed to enabling non contact activation of triple-shape effect in alternating magnetic field. Composites with variable PCLDIMA content ranging from 30 wt-% and 70 wt-% and different SNP amounts (0 wt-%, 2.5 wt-%, 5 wt-% and 10 wt-%) were realized by thermally induced polymerization. The thermal and mechanical properties of the CLEG nanocomposites were explored by means of DSC, DMTA and tensile tests. The triple-shape properties were quantified in cyclic, thermomechanical experiments, which consisted of a two step programming procedure and a recovery module under stress-free conditions for recovery of shapes B and C. While the thermal properties and the Young’s modulus of the investigated polymer networks were found to be independent from the incorporated amount of SNP, the elongation at break (εB) decreases with increasing nanoparticle content. All investigated composites exhibit excellent triple-shape properties showing a well separated two step shape recovery process.

Keywords

polymercompositememory
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1190: Symposium NN – Active Polymers , 2009 , 1190-NN03-21
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bellin, I., Kelch, S., Langer, R. and Lendlein, A., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (48), 18043–18047 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0608586103Google Scholar
2 Bellin, I., Kelch, S. and Lendlein, A., Journal of Materials Chemistry 17 (28), 2885–2891 (2007).10.1039/b702524fGoogle Scholar
3 Kolesov, I. S. and Radusch, H.-J., eXPRESS Polymer Letters 2(7), 461–473 (2008).10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.56Google Scholar
4 Behl, M., Bellin, I., Kelch, S., Wagermaier, W. and Lendlein, A., Advanced Functional Materials 19 (1), 102–108 (2009).10.1002/adfm.200800850Google Scholar
5 Lendlein, A. and Kelch, S., Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 41 (12), 2034–2057 (2002).10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<2034::AID-ANIE2034>3.0.CO;2-M3.0.CO;2-M>Google Scholar
6 Behl, M. and Lendlein, A., Soft Matter 3 (1), 58–67 (2007).10.1039/B610611KGoogle Scholar
7 Behl, M. and Lendlein, A., Materials Today 10 (4), 20–28 (2007).10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70047-0Google Scholar
8 Hayashi, S, Tasaka, Y, Hayashi, N, Akita, Y and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review 2004, 1–3.Google Scholar
9 Victor, A. B., Varyukhin, V. N. and Yurii, V. V., Russian Chemical Reviews (3), 265 (2005).Google Scholar
10 Yoshida, M., Langer, R., Lendlein, A. and Lahann, J., Polymer Reviews 46 (4), 347–375 (2006).Google Scholar
11 Gottfried, H., Janzen, C., Pridoehl, M., Roth, P., Trageser, B. & Zimmermann G. (2003) and U.S.Patent 6, 767.Google Scholar
12 Lin-Gibson, S., Bencherif, S., Cooper, J. A., Wetzel, S. J., Antonucci, J. M., Vogel, B. M., Horkay, F. and Washburn, N. R., Biomacromolecules 5 (4), 1280–1287 (2004).10.1021/bm0498777Google Scholar
13 Schwarzl, F. R., Polymermechanik; Springer: Berlin (1990).10.1007/978-3-642-61506-1Google Scholar
14 Li, Fengkui, Zhu, W., Zhang, X., Zhao, C. and Xu, M., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 71 (7), 1063–1070 (1999).10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990214)71:7<1063::AID-APP4>3.0.CO;2-A3.0.CO;2-A>Google Scholar
15 Tobushi, H., Hara, H., Yamada, E. and Hayashi, S., Smart Materials & Structures 5 (4), 483–491 (1996).10.1088/0964-1726/5/4/012Google Scholar