Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:14:50.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermal-Mechanical Evaluation of Plated Electro-Magnetic NiFe for MEMS Generators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Yibin Xue ,
Keithan Hillman  and
David Veazie
Yibin Xue
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, Clark Atlanta University PO Box 156, 223 James P. Brawley Dr. SW Atlanta, GA 30314
Keithan Hillman
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, Clark Atlanta University PO Box 156, 223 James P. Brawley Dr. SW Atlanta, GA 30314
David Veazie
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, Clark Atlanta University PO Box 156, 223 James P. Brawley Dr. SW Atlanta, GA 30314
Get access

Abstract

In micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) devices that contain multi-layers of metallic, ceramic, and polymeric materials, acquiring a complete understanding of the mechanical properties and interfacial strength are critical in designing the devices. In general, these layered materials are specially fabricated with thickness of each layer on submicron and/or micron scale. Particularly, the properties of these layered materials strongly depend on the fabrication processes and subsequent treatments. In this paper, we study the magnetic metallic films, NiFe (80/20 in weight), for MEMS generator/motor applications. A set of tensile tests was conducted on the plated nickel-iron metallic films of various thicknesses and subjected to various annealing conditions. Distinctive differences in mechanical behaviors between the electroplated films and the corresponding bulk alloys were observed. Furthermore, the NiFe film as-deposited exhibits almost pure elastic deformation and brittle fracture at room temperature; whereas the NiFe film subjected to annealing exhibits strain hardening and ductile fracture when tested at room temperature. X-ray diffraction was used to capture the variation of crystalline structure and the residual stresses in the electroplated films as deposited and after annealing. An atomic force microscope was used to obtain the surface morphology of the films as deposited and after annealing.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 795: Symposium U – Thin Films - Stresses and Mechanical Properties X , 2003 , U11.35
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lavan, D.A., Sharpe, W.N., “Tensile testing of Microsamples,” Experimnental Mechanics, 39, 210–216 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Sharpe, W. N. Jr,, “Murry Lecture Tensile Testing at the Micrometer scale: Opportunities in Experimental mechanics”, Experimental Mechanics, 43, 228–237 (2003)Google Scholar
3. Srikar, V.T. and Spearing, S. M., “a Critical Review of Microscale Mechanical Testing Methods Used in the Design of Microelectromechanical Systems”, Experimental Mechanics, 43, 238–247 (2003)Google Scholar
4. Yi, T., Li, L., and Kim, C.J., “Microscale Material Testing of Single Crystalline Silicon: Process Effects on Surface Morphology and Tensile Strength”, Sensors and Actuators, A83, 172–178 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Tsuchiya, T., Tabata, O., Sakata, J., and Taga, Y., “Specimen Size Effect on Tensile Strength of Surface-Micromeachined Polycrystalline Silicon Thin Films,” Journal of Microelectromechnicsal System, 7 (1), 106–113 (1998)Google Scholar
6. Haque, M.A. and Sif, M.T.A., “In-Situ Tensile Testing of Nanoscale Specimens in SEM and TEM,” Experimental Mechanics, 42 (1), 123–128 (2002).Google Scholar
7. Rud, J. A., Josell, D., Spaepen, F., and Greeer, A.L., “A New Method for Tensile Testing of Thin Films,” Journal of Material Research, 8 (1), 112–117 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Huang, H. and Spaepen, F., “Tensile Testing of Free-Standing Cu, Ag, and Al Thin Films and Ag/Cu Multilayers,” Acta Materialia, 48, 3216–3269 (2000).Google Scholar