Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:31:55.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperature and Dislocation Density Effects on the Thermal Conductivity of Bulk Gallium Nitride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Christian Mion ,
John Muth ,
Edward Preble  and
Drew Hanser
Christian Mion
Affiliation:
[email protected]
John Muth
Affiliation:
[email protected], United States
Edward Preble
Affiliation:
[email protected]
Drew Hanser
Affiliation:
[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The performance of III-Nitride high power, high frequency transistors and laser diodes is intimately connected with the ability to dissipate heat from the junction to the substrate. The thermal conductivity was characterized by the three omega method for undoped and doped gallium nitride bulk substrates grown by HVPE from room temperature to 450 K. The thickness of the samples varied from thin film epilayers on sapphire to 2 millimeter thick free standing samples Dislocation density of the substrates was measured by imaging cathodoluminescence, SIMS was used to measure impurity levels of oxygen, hydrogen, silicon, and iron, while carrier concentrations and resistivity were determined from electrical measurements and EPR. A semi-insulating, 2 mm thick iron doped sample had the highest thermal conductivity of 230W/K-m at room temperature. Undoped samples had comparable, but lower thermal conductivities throughout the temperature range from 300-450 K. By comparing these results with previously reported experimental results including those on MOCVD grown GaN free of grain boundaries, we establish an empirical relationship in a compact formula that relates the thermal conductivity of GaN and the dislocation density with three different regimes of low, intermediate, and high dislocation densities. In the high dislocation regime, the thermal conductivity improves significantly with reduction of dislocation densities. As material quality continues to improve it remains to be seen if in the low dislocation density regime, thermal conductivities will approach 300 W/K-m or plateau out near 250 W/K-m. As point defects start to limit the thermal conductivity when dislocation density becomes very low, gallium vacancies are expected to play an increasing role. Iron is postulated to substitute on the gallium site. The indication from this study is that iron doping at concentration of 1018 cm-3 is not limiting the thermal conductivity in the 300-450 K range.

Keywords

thermal conductivityIII-Vsemiconducting
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 892 , 2005 , 0892-FF29-05
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Florescu, D. I., Asnin, V. M., Pollak, F. H., Jones, A. M., Ramer, J. C., Schurman, M. J., and Ferguson, I., Applied Physics Letters 77, 1464 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Sichel, E. K. and Pankove, J. I., Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 38, 330 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Jezowski, A., Danilchenko, B. A., Bockowski, M., Grzegory, I., Krukowski, S., Suski, T., and Paszkiewicz, T., Solid State Communications 128, 69 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Luo, C., Clarke, D. R., and Dryden, J. R., Journal of Electronic Materials 30, 138 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Slack, G. A., Schowalter, L. J., Morelli, D., and Freitas, J. A. Jr., Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 246, 287 (2002).Google Scholar
[6] Florescu, D. I., Asnin, V. M., Pollak, F. H., Molnar, R. J., and Wood, C. E. C., Journal of Applied Physics 88, 3295 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Vaudo, R. P., Brandes, G. R., Flynn, J. S., Xu, X., Chriss, M. F., Christos, C. S., Keogh, D. M., and Tamweber, F. D., Proceedings of International Workshop on Nitride Semiconductors 24–27 Sept. 2000, 15 (2000).Google Scholar
[8] Kamano, M., Haraguchi, M., Niwaki, T., Fukui, M., Kuwahara, M., Okamoto, T., and Mukai, T., Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 41, 5034 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Cahill, D. G., Review of Scientific Instruments 61, 802 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Kim, J. H., Feldman, A., and Novotny, D., Journal of Applied Physics 86, 3959 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Borca-Tasciuc, T., Kumar, A. R., and Chen, G., Review of Scientific Instruments 72, 2139 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Mathis, S. K., Romanov, A. E., Chen, L. F., Beltz, G. E., Pompe, W., and Speck, J. S., Physica Status Solidi a 179, 125 (2000).3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar