Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:44:39.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technological options for disposal of waste containing TENORM of oil industry in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2012

Mara R. F. V. Alves  and
Susana O. Souza
Mara R. F. V. Alves
Affiliation:
PETROBRAS/UO-SEAL, CEP: 49.080-010, Aracaju, SE, Brazil. Departments of Materials Engineering, CCET/UFS, CEP:49.100-000 São Cristóvão/SE, Brazil.
Susana O. Souza
Affiliation:
Physics Department, CCET/UFS, CEP: 49.100-000 São Cristóvão/SE, Brazil.
Get access

Abstract

Some human activities can focus radioactive natural materials on their waste and products through technological processes by increasing the local background radioactivity at values that may compromise the health and safety of persons and the environment. The oil industry waste containing technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials (TENORM) are high volume and low levels activity cannot be classified and arranged according to the Brazilian standard for classification of waste generating a stalemate in its management in Brazil. This work has identified technological alternatives for the disposal of waste containing TENORM available in the world and examined its use in the oil industry in Brazil, considering the Brazilian legislation.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1475: Symposium NW – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXV , 2012 , imrc11-1475-nw35-p58
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. ABNT. NBR 10.004: Resíduos sólidos. Classificação. Rio de Janeiro, 2004.Google Scholar
2. CNEN. NE-6.05: Gerência de rejeitos radioativos em instalações radiativas. Resolução, 1985; PR-3.01-001. Critérios de exclusão, isenção e dispensa de requisites de proteção radiológica. Resolução, 2011.Google Scholar
3. BRASIL. Lei 10.308, de 20 de novembro de 2001; Lei 12.305, de 23 de dezembro de 2011.Google Scholar
4. Freire, C. B. Estudo de sorção de césio e estrôncio em argilas nacionais para sua utilização como barreira em repositórios de rejeitos radioativos. Dissertação de Mestrado. UFMG/CDTN, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2007.Google Scholar
5. IAEA. Radiation protection and the management of radioactive waste in the oil and gas industry. (TCS N°. 40). IAEA, VIENNA, 2010.Google Scholar
6. Gazineu, M. H. P. Teores de radionuclídeos em processos de extração e de produção de petróleo no nordeste do Brasil. Tese de Doutorado. UFPE/DEN, Recife, PE, Brasil, 2005.Google Scholar
7. Valeur, J. R. Environmental impacts of different NORM disposal methods. Paper SPE 136312 presented in Mananma, Bahrain, 4–6 October 2010.10.2118/136312-MSGoogle Scholar
8. SNIFFER. Identification and assessment of alternative disposal for radioactive oilfield waste. Tecnhical Summary Report Project UKRSR07. Edinburgh, SNIFFER, 2005.Google Scholar
9. OGP. Guidelines for the management of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) in the oil & gas industry. Report No. 412. United Kingdom: OGP, 2008.Google Scholar
10. OSPAR. Agreed reporting procedures for discharges of radioactive substances from non-nuclear sectors. RSC 04/13/1; 2004.Google Scholar