Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:24:25.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subcritical Delamination of Dielectric and Metal Films from Low-k Organosilicate Glass (OSG) Thin Films in Buffered pH Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Y. Lin ,
J. J. Vlassak ,
T. Y. Tsui  and
A. J. McKerrow
Y. Lin
Affiliation:
DEAS, Harvard University, 29 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
J. J. Vlassak
Affiliation:
DEAS, Harvard University, 29 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
T. Y. Tsui
Affiliation:
Silicon Technology Development, Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas, TX 75243, USA
A. J. McKerrow
Affiliation:
Silicon Technology Development, Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas, TX 75243, USA
Get access

Abstract

Understanding subcritical fracture of low-k dielectric materials and barrier thin films in buffered solutions of different pH value is of both technical and scientific importance. Subcritical delamination of dielectric and metal barrier films from low-k organosilicate glass (OSG) films in pH buffer solutions was studied in this work. Crack path and subcritical fracture behavior of OSG depends on the choice of barrier layers. For the OSG/TaN system, fracture takes place in the OSG layer near the interface, while in OSG/SiNx system, delamination occurs at the interface. Delamination behavior of both systems is well described by a hyperbolic sine model that had been developed previously based on a chemical reaction controlled fracture process at the crack tip. The threshold toughness of both systems decreases linearly with increasing pH value. The slopes of the reaction-controlled regime of the crack velocity curves for both systems are independent of pH as predicted by the model. Near transport-controlled regime behavior was observed in OSG/TaN system.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 795: Symposium U – Thin Films - Stresses and Mechanical Properties X , 2003 , U8.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wiederhorn, S. M. and Johnson, H., Journal of The American Ceramic Society, 56 (4), 192 (1973).Google Scholar
2. Cook, R. E. and Liniger, E. G., Journal of The American Ceramic Society, 76 (5), 1096 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Lin, Y., Vlassak, J. J., Tsui, T.Y. and McKerrow, A.J., MRS Proceedings, 766, E9.4 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Lane, M. W., Snodgrass, J. M. and Dauskardt, R. H., Environmental effects on interfacial adhesion. Microelectron. Reliability, 41, 1615–1624 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Charalambides, P. G., Lund, J., Evans, A. G. and McMeeking, R. M., Journal of Applied Mechanics, 56, 77 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Ma, Q., Fujimoto, H., Flinn, P., Jain, V., Adibi-Rizi, F., Moghadam, F. and Dauskardt, R. H., in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics V, edited by Oates, A. S., Filter, W. F., Rosenberg, R., Greer, A. L. and Gadepally, K. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 391, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), pp. 91–96.Google Scholar
7. Ma, Q., Journal of Materials Research, 12 (3), 840 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Ligatchev, V., Wong, T. K. S., Liu, B. and Rusli, , Journal of Applied Physics, 92 (8), 4605–4611 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Wiederhorn, S. M., Journal of The American Ceramic Society, 50 (8), 407 (1967).Google Scholar