Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:07:38.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure control of Pt-SnO2catalyst for DEFC synthesized by electron beam irradiation method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2014

Tomohisa Okazaki
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Satoshi Seino
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Yuji Ohkubo
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Takashi Nakagawa
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Takao A. Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Carbon supported Pt-SnO2 electrocatalysts with different Sn/Pt molar ratios were prepared by an electron beam irradiation method. Dissolved gas conditions in the vials irradiated with electron beam were controlled to air or Ar. The results of the material analyses showed that both Pt and SnO2 were immobilized onto carbon support in all catalysts. Bubbling Ar to the precursor solution led to steady change of metal contents in response to the precursor concentrations. The ethanol oxidation activity plotted against Sn/Pt ratio behaved differently with dissolved gas condition of the vial. This difference is discussed with supposed existing state of SnO2 in connection with the reduction process of Pt and Sn.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Zhou, W., Zhou, Z., Song, S., Li, W., Sun, G., Tsiakaras, P., and Xin, Q., Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 46, 273285 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belloni, J., Catal. Today 113, 141156 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kageyama, S., Seino, S., Nakagawa, T., Nitani, H., Ueno, K., Daimon, H., and Yamamoto, T. A., J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 52755287 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kageyama, S., Murakami, A., Ichikawa, S., Seino, S., Nakagawa, T., Daimon, H., Ohkubo, Y., Kugai, J., and Yamamoto, T. A., J. Mater. Res. 27, 10371045 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kugai, J., Kitagawa, R., Seino, S., Nakagawa, T., Ohkubo, Y., Nitani, H., Daimon, H., and Yamamoto, T. A., Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 406, 4350 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seino, S., Kinoshita, T., Nakagawa, T., Kojima, T., Taniguci, R., Okuda, S., and Yamamoto, T. A., J. Nanopart. Res. 10, 10711076 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radmilovic, V., Gasteiger, H.A., Ross, P.N., J. Catal. 154, 98106 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, R. J., Pikaev, A. K., Applied Radiation Chemistry: Radiation Processing, (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1993) p. 168 Google Scholar
Yamamoto, T. A., Nakagawa, T., Seino, S., Nitani, H., Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 387, 195202 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar