Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:21:21.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural Refinement in Al-MoO3 Nanocomposites Prepared by Arrested Reactive Milling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Swati Umbrajkar
Affiliation:
[email protected], New Jersey Institute Of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, 10, Cross St, Apt # 4, Belleville, NJ, 07109, United States, 973-704-8582
Mirko Schoenitz
Affiliation:
[email protected], New Jersey Institute Of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, United States
Edward L Dreizin
Affiliation:
[email protected], New Jersey Institute Of Technology, Mechanical Engineering
Get access

Abstract

Al-MoO3 nanocomposites were synthesized based on arrested reactive milling. Altering the milling parameters leads to different scales of refinement in the structure of the reactive nanocomposites. The objective of this work is to determine the range in which the degree of structural refinement can be changed in a controlled manner. The milling intensity was controlled by using different milling media along with varying amounts of process control agent (PCA). XRD, SEM, DSC and wire-ignition tests were performed to analyze the Al-MoO3 nanocomposites. Results indicate that there is a decrease in the crystallite size with increase in the milling intensity. However increase in milling intensity also stimulates the undesired reaction between Al and MoO3. Milling conditions resulting in the highest structural refinement and lowest ignition temperatures were identified.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bockmon, B. S., Pantoya, M. L., Son, S. F., Asay, B. W., Mang, J. T. Journal of Applied Physics 98 (6), pp. 17, (2005)Google Scholar
2. Moore, D. S., Son, S. F., Asay, B. W. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 29 (2), pp. 106111 (2004)Google Scholar
3. Blobaum, K. J., Reiss, M. E., Plitzko, J. M. Lawrence, Weihs, T. P. Journal of Applied Physics V. 94, No. 5 pp 29152922, (2003).Google Scholar
4. Schoenitz, M., Ward, T., Dreizin, E. L., Materials Research Society Proceedings, V. 800, pp: AA2.6.1–AA2.6.6 (2004)Google Scholar
5. Schoenitz, M., Ward, T. S., and Dreizin, E. L., Proceedings of The Combustion Institute 30 pp. 20712078 (2005)Google Scholar
6. Balakir, E. A.; Bushuev, Yu. G.; Bareskov, N. A.; Kosyakin, A. E.; Kudryavtsev, Yu. V.; Fedorova, O. N., Fizika Goreniya i Vzryva, 11(1), 4346 (1975) (in Russian)Google Scholar
7. Bulian, C. J., Kerr, T. T., Swiatkiewicz, J. J., Puszynski, J. A. AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings pp. 22932298, (2004)Google Scholar
8. Takacs, L., Soika, V., Balaz, P., Solid State Ionics V 141–142 pp 641647 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Balaz, P., Takacs, L., Boldizarova, E., Godocokova, E. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 64 pp 14131417 (2003).Google Scholar
10. Ward, T. S., Trunov, M. A., Dreizin, E. L. Fourth Joint Meeting of the U.S. Sections of the Combustion Institute Philadelphia March 23–25 (2005).Google Scholar
11. Table of emissivity of various surfaces by Micron Instrument Company, Inc., http://www.transmetra.ch/pdf/publikationen/emissivity.pdf Google Scholar
12. Larson, A. C and Von Dreele, R. B., Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR 86–748 (2000)Google Scholar