Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:41:39.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stochastic Analysis of Groundwater Traveltime for Long-Term Repository Performance Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

P.M. Clifton ,
R.G. Baca  and
R.C. Arnett
P.M. Clifton
Affiliation:
Rockwell Hanford Operations, P.O. Box 800, Richland WA 99352
R.G. Baca
Affiliation:
Rockwell Hanford Operations, P.O. Box 800, Richland WA 99352
R.C. Arnett
Affiliation:
Rockwell Hanford Operations, P.O. Box 800, Richland WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes a method of stochastically analyzing groundwater traveltime. The method uses a Monte Carlo technique to generate a suite of random spatial fields that are subsequently input to the groundwater flow and groundwater traveltime equations. Stochastic inputs to these equations can be (1) transmissivity (or hydraulic conductivity), (2) effective thickness (or effective porosity), or (3) boundary conditions. In a transient problem, storage coefficient (or specific storage) could also be stochastically treated. Spatial correlation in the random input fields is accounted for by means of a multivariate random-number generator, which requires the first two statistical moments of these fields to be specified. The output from the Monte Carlo analysis is a suite of groundwater traveltime realizations that can be used to derive exceedance probabilities. These probabilities provide a measure of the degree of confidence in meeting set criteria.

A preliminary application of this method using data from the deep basalts beneath the Hanford Site is also presented. The results illustrate how this method can be used to evaluate compliance with a technical criterion relating to groundwater traveltime.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 26: Symposium D – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII , 1983 , 161
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in Geologic Repositories: Performance Objectives and Technical Criteria, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60 (Draft Final Rule), Washington, D.C. (1982).Google Scholar
2. Bear, J., Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media (American Elsevier Publishing Co., New York 1972).Google Scholar
3. Gelhar, L.W., Analysis of Two-Well Tracer Tests with a Pulse Input, RHO-EW-CR-131 P, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1982).Google Scholar
4. Leonhart, L.S., Jackson, R.L., Graham, D.L., Thompson, G.M., and Gelhar, L.W., Groundwater Flow and Transport Characteristics of Flood Basalts as Determined from Tracer Experiments, RHO-BW-SA-220 P, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1982).Google Scholar
5. Baca, R.G., Arnett, R.C., and Langford, D.W., Modeling Fluid Flow in Fractured-Porous Rock Masses by Finite-Element Techniques, RHO-BW-SA-297 P, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1983).Google Scholar
6. Neuman, S.P., Statistical Characterization of Aquifer Heterogeneities: An Overview, in Recent Trends in Hydrogeology, Narasimhan, T.N. ed., Geological Society of America Special Paper 189, 81–102 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Freeze, R.A., A Stochastic-Conceptual Analysis of One-Dimensional Groundwater Flow in Nonuniform Homogeneous Media, Water Resources Research, 11 (5), 725–741 (1975).Google Scholar
8. Davis, S.N., Porosity and Permeability of Natural Materials, in Flow Through Porous Media, DeWiest, R.J.M. ed., (Academic Press, New York 1969) 53–89.Google Scholar
9. Bianchi, L. and Snow, D.T., Permeability of Crystalline Rock Interpreted from Measured Orientations and Apertures of Fractures, Annals of Arid Zone, Jodhpor, 8 (2), 231–245 (1969).Google Scholar
10. Clifton, P.M. and Neuman, S.P., Effects of Kriging and Inverse Modeling on Conditional Simulation of the Avra Valley Aquifer in Southern Arizona, Water Resources Research 18 (4), 1215–1234 (1982).Google Scholar
1l. Myers, C.W., Price, S.M., and others, Geologic Studies of the Columbia Plateau: A Status Report, RHO-BWI-ST-4, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1979).Google Scholar
12. Spane, F.A., Hydrologic Studies Within the Pasco Basin, in: Proceedings of the 1982 National Waste Terminal Storage Program Information Meeting, DOE/NWTS-30, Office of NWTS Integration, Columbus, OH, 23–30, (1982).Google Scholar
13. Gephart, R.E., Price, S.M., Jackson, R.L., and Myers, C.W., Geohydrologic Factors and Current Concepts Relevant to Characterization of a Potential Nuclear Waste Repository in Basalt, Hanford Site, Washington, RHO-BW-SA-298 P, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1983).Google Scholar
14. Journel, A. and Huijbregts, C.J., 1978, Mining Geostatistics, (Academic Press, London 1978).Google Scholar
15. Ripley, B.D., Spatial Statistics, (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York 1982).Google Scholar
16. Matheron, G. and de Marsily, G., Is Transport in Porous Media Always Diffusive?, A Counterexample, Water Resources Research 16 (5), 901–907 (1980).Google Scholar