Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:32:46.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sensitivity of UO2 Stability in a Reducing Environment on Radiolysis Model Parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

Richard S. Wittman
Affiliation:
Energy and Environment Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, U.S.A.
Edgar C. Buck
Affiliation:
Energy and Environment Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Results for a radiolysis model sensitivity study of radiolytically produced H2O2 are presented as they relate to Spent (or Used) Light Water Reactor uranium oxide (UO2) nuclear fuel (UNF) oxidation in a low oxygen environment. The model builds on previous reaction kinetic studies to represent the radiolytic processes occurring at the nuclear fuel surface. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is the dominant oxidant for spent nuclear fuel in an O2-depleted water environment. The most sensitive parameters have been identified with respect to predictions under typical conditions. As compared with the full model with about 100 reactions, it was found that only 30 to 40 of the reactions are required to determine [H2O2] to one part in 10–5 and to preserve most of the predictions for major species. This allows a systematic approach for model simplification and offers guidance in designing experiments for validation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pastina, B. and LaVerne, J. A., Effect of Molecular Hydrogen on Hydrogen Peroxide in Water Radiolysis, J. Phys. Chem. A 105 (2001) 93169322.Google Scholar
2. Christian, H. and Sunder, S., Calculations of radiation induced corrosion of UO2 in solutions containing carbonate, STUDSVIK/M-96/4.Google Scholar
3. Christensen, H. and Sunder, S., An evaluation of water layer thickness effective in oxidation of UO2 fuel due to radiolysis of water, J. Nucl. Mater., 238 (1996) 7077.Google Scholar
4. Kline, A. J., The Dissolution Rate of Unirradiated UO2 under Repository Conditions: The Influence of Fuel and Water Chemistry, Dissolved Oxygen, and Temperature, Doctoral Thesis submitted to the University of Missouri-Columbia, 2008.Google Scholar
5. Radulescu, G., Radiation Transport Evaluations for Repository Science, ORNL/LTR-2011/294, LETTER REPORT, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, August, 2011.Google Scholar
6. Eriksen, T. E., Shoesmith, D. W., Jonsson, M., Radiation induced dissolution of UO2 based nuclear fuel – A critical review of predictive modeling approaches, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 420(2012) 409423.Google Scholar
7. Shoesmith, D.W., Kolar, M., and King, F., A Mixed-Potential Model to Predict Fuel (Uranium Dioxide) Corrosion within a Failed Nuclear Waste Container, Corrosion 59(2003) 802816.Google Scholar