Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:18:33.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residual Stress Control to Optimize Pzt Mems Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

M.S. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164–2920
D.F. Bahr
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164–2920
C.D. Richards
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164–2920
R.F. Richards
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164–2920
Get access

Abstract

Flexing piezoelectric membranes can be used to convert mechanical energy to electrical energy. The overall deflection of individual membranes is impacted by the residual stress in the system. Membranes comprised of silicon dioxide, Ti/Pt, lead- zirconate- titanate (PZT), and TiW/Au layers deposited on a micromachined boron doped silicon wafer were examined for both morphology and residual stress. By characterizing the membrane residual stress induced during processing with x-ray diffraction, wafer curvature, and bulge testing and identifying methods to reduce stress, the membrane performance and reliability can be optimized. For Zr:Ti ratios of 52:48, the residual stress in the PZT was 350 MPa tensile, with an overall effective stress in the composite membrane of 150 MPa. A reduction of stress was accomplished by changing the PZT chemistry to 40:60 Zr:Ti in the PZT to obtain a stress in the PZT of 160 MPa tensile and an overall effective membrane stress of 100 MPa. The crystallization of the 52:48 PZT film at 700 °C causes a 28% reduction in the thickness of the film.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bahr, D.F., Bruce, K.R., Olson, B.W., Eakins, L.M., Richards, C.D., and Richards, R.F., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 687, p. 4.3.1 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Thorton, J.A., Hoffman, D.W.. Thin Solid Films, 171, 5 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Ding, , Xiaoyi, and Ko, Wen H.. Transducers '91: In. Conf. Solid State Sens. Actuators, IEEE, p. 201 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Sengupta, , SS., , Park, S.M., Payne, D.A., Allen, L.H.. J. App. Phys. 83, 2291 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Zakar, , Polcawich, E. R., Dubey, M., Pulskamp, J., Piekarski, B., Conrad, J., Piekarz, R.. IEEE Int. Symp. App. of Ferroelectrics, 2, 757 (2000)Google Scholar
6. Bonnotte, E., Delobelle, P., Bornier, L.. J. Mater. Res. 12, 2234 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Vlassak, J.J., Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 7, 3242 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Shojaei, O.R., Karimi, A., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc., 522, 245 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Bahr, D.F., Crozier, B.T., Richards, C.D., Richards, R.F., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 657, p. 4.4.1 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Olson, B.W., Randall, L.M., Richards, C.D., Richards, R.F., Bahr, D.F., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 666, p. 6.1.1 (2001).Google Scholar