Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:14:44.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reactive Multilayer Foils for Silicon Wafer Bonding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Xiaotun Qiu  and
Jiaping Wang
Xiaotun Qiu
Affiliation:
[email protected], Louisiana State University, Mechanical Engineering, 2508 CEBA, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, United States
Jiaping Wang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Louisiana State University, Department of Mechanical Engineerring, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, United States
Get access

Abstract

In this study silicon wafers were bonded using Al/Ni reactive multilayer foils as local heat sources for melting solder layers. Exothermic reactions in Al/Ni reactive multilayer foils were investigated by XRD and DSC. XRD measurements showed that dominant product after exothermic reaction was ordered B2 AlNi compound. The heat of reaction was calculated to be -57.9 KJ/mol by DSC. With Al/Ni reactive multilayer foil, localized heating can be achieved during bonding process. Both experimental measurements and numerical simulation showed that the heat exposure to the wafers was highly limited and localized. Moreover, leakage test showed that this bonding approach possessed a good hermeticity.

Keywords

joiningenergetic materialthin film
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 968: Symposium V – Advanced Electronic Packaging , 2006 , 0968-V02-06
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Schmidt, M. A., Proc. IEEE. 86, 1575 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Sparks, D., Queen, G., Weston, R., Woodward, G., Putty, M., Jordan, L., Zarabadi, S., Jayakar, K., J. Micromech. Microeng. 11, 630 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Sarvar, F., Hunt, D. A., Whalley, D. C., Proc. IEEE Polytronic. 22 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Wang, J., Besnoin, E., Duckham, A., Spey, S. J., Reiss, M. E., Knio, O. M., Weihs, T. P., J. Appl. Phys. 95, 248 (2004).10.1063/1.1629390Google Scholar
5. Wang, J., Besnoin, E., Knio, O. M., Weihs, T. P., J. Appl. Phys. 97, 4307 (2005).Google Scholar
6. Duckham, A., Spey, S. J., Wang, J., Reiss, M. E., Weihs, T. P., J. Appl. Phys. 96, 2336 (2004).10.1063/1.1769097Google Scholar
7. Wang, J., Besnoin, E., Duckham, A., Spey, S. J., Reiss, M., Knio, O. M., Powers, M., Whitener, M., Weihs, T. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3987 (2003).Google Scholar
8. Swiston, A. J.. Jr, Hufnagel, T. C., Weihs, T. P., Scripta. Mater. 48, 1575 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Pretorius, R., Vredenberg, A. M., Saris, F. W., Reus, R. de, J. Appl. Phys. 70, 3636 (1991).10.1063/1.349211Google Scholar