Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:42:36.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

γ-Radiolysis of NaCl Brine in the Presence of UO2(s): Effects of Hydrogen and Bromide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2011

Volker Metz
Affiliation:
[email protected], Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe / Research Center Karlsruhe, Institute for Radioactive Waste Disposal (FZK-INE), Helmholtz-Platz, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, D-76344, Germany, ++49-7247-82-8078, ++49-7247-82-4308
Elke Bohnert
Affiliation:
[email protected], Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe / Research Center Karlsruhe, Institute for Radioactive Waste Disposal (FZK-INE), Helmholtz-Platz, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, D-76344, Germany
Manfred Kelm
Affiliation:
[email protected], Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe / Research Center Karlsruhe, Institute for Radioactive Waste Disposal (FZK-INE), Helmholtz-Platz, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, D-76344, Germany
Dieter Schild
Affiliation:
[email protected], Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe / Research Center Karlsruhe, Institute for Radioactive Waste Disposal (FZK-INE), Helmholtz-Platz, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, D-76344, Germany
Jörgen Reinhardt
Affiliation:
[email protected], IOM, Leibniz-Institut für Oberflächenmodifizierung, Permoserstr. 15, Leipzig, D-04318, Germany
Bernhard Kienzler
Affiliation:
[email protected], Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe / Research Center Karlsruhe, Institute for Radioactive Waste Disposal (FZK-INE), Helmholtz-Platz, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, D-76344, Germany
Michael R. Buchmeiser
Affiliation:
[email protected], IOM, Leibniz-Institut für Oberflächenmodifizierung, Permoserstr. 15, Leipzig, D-04318, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Concentrated NaCl solution was γ-irradiated in autoclaves under a pressure of 25 MPa. A set of experiments were conducted in 6 mol (kg H2O)-1 NaCl solution in presence of UO2(s) pellets; in a second set of experiments γ-radiolysis of the NaCl brine was studied without UO2(s). Hydrogen, oxygen and chlorate were formed as lonγ-lived radiolysis products. Due to the high external pressure, all radiolysis products remained dissolved. H2 and O2 reached steady state concentrations in the range of 5·10-3 to 6·10-2 mol (kg H2O)-1 corresponding to gas partial pres-sure of ∼2 to ∼20 MPa. Radiolytic formation of hydrogen and oxygen increases with the concentration of bromide added to solution. Both, in the presence of bromide, resulting in a relatively high radiolytic yield, and in the absence of bromide surfaces of the UO2(s) samples were oxi-dized, and concentration of dissolved uranium reached the solubility limit of schoepite / NaUO2O(OH)(cr) transition. At the end of the experiments the pellets were covered by a surface layer of a secondary solid phase having a composition close to Na2U2O7. The experimental results demonstrate that bromide counteracts an H2 inhibition effect on radiolysis gas production, even at a concentration ratio of [H2] / [Br-] > 100. The present observations are related to the competitive reactions of OH radicals with H2, Br- and Cl-. A similar competition of hydrogen and bromide, controlling the yield of γ-radiolysis products, is expected for solutions of lower Cl- concentration

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Loida, A., Metz, V., Kienzler, B., and Geckeis, H., Nucl, J. . Mat. 346, 24 (2005).Google Scholar
2. Spahiu, K., Carbol, P., Cobos-Sabate, J., Glatz, J. P., Ronchi, C., Rondinella, V. V., Wegen, D., Wiss, T., Loida, A., Metz, V., Kienzler, B., Grambow, B., Quinones, J., and Martinez-Esparza, A., Svensk Kärnbränslehantering, SKB TR-05-09, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.Google Scholar
3. Kelm, M. and Bohnert, E., Nucl, J. . Mat. 346, 1 (2005).Google Scholar
4. Spahiu, K., Cui, D., and Lundstöm, M., Radiochim. Acta 92, 625 (2004).Google Scholar
5. Henglein, A., Schnabel, W., and Wendenburg, J., Einführung in die Strahlenchemie (Verlag Chemie GmbH, Weinheim, Germany, 1969).Google Scholar
6. Wittwer, C., NTB 85-49 report, NAGRA, Wettingen, Switzerland, 1986.Google Scholar
7. Ekberg, C., Uncertainties in actinide solubility calculations illustrated using the Th-OHPO4 system. Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers University, Göteborg, Sweden, 1999.Google Scholar
8. Pearson, F. J., Arcos, D., Bath, A., Boisson, J.-Y., Fernandez, A. M., Gäbler, H.-E., Gaucher, E., Gautschi, E., Griffault, L., Hernan, P., and Waber, H. N., Bundesamt für Wasser und Geologie, BWG, Bern, Switzerland, 2003.Google Scholar
9. Herrmann, A. G. and Borstel, L. E. v., N. Jahrb. Min. Monat., 1991, 263 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Loida, A., Kienzler, B., and Metz, V., accepted, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. (2007).Google Scholar
11. Bohnert, E., Kelm, M., Kienzler, B., Marquardt, C., Metz, V., and Schild, D., NF-PRO deliverable 1.5.5, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany, p. 27, 2006.Google Scholar
12. Altmaier, M., Metz, V., Neck, V., Müller, R., and T. Fanghänel Geochim.Cosmochim. Acta 67, 35953601 (2003).Google Scholar
13. Kelm, M. and Bohnert, E., Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Wissenschaftliche Berichte FZKA6977, 60 (2004).Google Scholar
14. Carver, M. B., Hanley, D. V., Ross, N., and Austin., C. MACKSIMA-CHEMIST, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., AECL-6413, Chalk River, Canada, 1987.Google Scholar
15. Fanghänel, T. and Neck, V., Pure and Applied Chemistry 74, 1895 (2002).Google Scholar
16. Neck, V., Altmaier, M., Müller, R., Schlieker, M., and Fanghänel, T., 9th Intl. Conf. Chemistry Migration Actinides & Fission Products, p.47, Gyeongju, Korea, 2003.Google Scholar