Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:23:38.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation and characterization of monolithic HgCdTe/CdTe tandem cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

S. L. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
J. Drayton
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
V. Parikh
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
A. Vasko
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
A. Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
A. D. Compaan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
Get access

Abstract

A prototype monolithic HgCdTe/CdTe superstrate tandem cell has been fabricated by RF sputtering, comprising a CdTe/CdS top cell, a ZnTe:N/ZnO:Al interconnect junction and a HgCdTe/CdS bottom cell. The Hg1−xCdxTe film as the bottom absorption layer was deposited by RF sputtering with 70% or 85% Cd content in the Hg1−xCdxTe magnetron target. Hg1−xCdxTe films with band gap from 0.98 eV to 1.45 eV were obtained by controlling the deposition temperature. CdCl2 thermal treatments were used to improve the Hg1−xCdxTe film electrical properties. A nitrogen-doped ZnTe film combined with an aluminium (Al) doped ZnO film formed a good interconnect junction. Results of Voc = 0.99 V and Jsc = 2.1 mA/cm2 were obtained in the best such tandem cell at one sun (AM1.5).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Coutts, T. J., Emery, K. A. and Ward, J. S., Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 10, 195203, (2002)Google Scholar
2. Coutts, T. J., Ward, J.S., Young, D. L., Emery, K. A., Gessert, T. A. and Noufi, R., Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 11, 359375, (2003)Google Scholar
3. Gupta, A. and Compaan, A. D., Applied Physics Letters, 85(4) 684 (2004)Google Scholar
4. Wu, X.. Keane, J. C., Dhere, R. G., DeHart, C., Albin, D. S., Duda, A., Gessert, T. A., Asher, S., Levi, D. H., and Sheldon, P., Proc. 17th Europen PVSEC, pp.995, (2001)Google Scholar
5. Rose, D., Powell, R., Jayamaha, U., Maltby, M., Giolando, D., McMaster, A., Komanyos, K., Faykosh, G., Klopping, J., and Dorer, G., Proc. 28th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 2000, pp. 428, (2000).Google Scholar
6. Lee, S. H., Gupta, A., Compaan, A. D., Phys. Stat. Sol. (c) 1, pp.1042, (2004)Google Scholar
7. McCandless, B. E., Proc. 29th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 2002, pp. 488, (2002).Google Scholar
8. Feng, Z., Tabory, C. N., and Compaan, A. D., 1st World conference of photovoltaic energy conversion (1994), pp.350, (1994)Google Scholar
9. Palik, E. D., Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, II (Academic Press), p.655, (1990)Google Scholar
10. Schroder, D. K., Semiconductor material and device characterization (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) p109, (1990)Google Scholar
11. Compaan, A. D., Drayton, J., Parikh, V., Gupta, A., Yu, Y., Taylor, C, Osborn, T. and Bohn, R.G., Proceedings of 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2P–A8 (2003)Google Scholar
12. Drayton, J., Parikh, V., Rich, G., Gupta, A., Osborn, T., Bohn, R. G., Compann, A. D., McCandless, B. E., Paulson, P. D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 763, 353, (2003)Google Scholar