Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:30:57.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post-Processing Electrospun Fibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2011

Caroline L. Schauer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Marjorie S. Austero
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Amanda C. Toth
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Get access

Abstract

Electrospinning is an inexpensive and simple method of producing non-woven fiber mats. Electrostatic forces are employed to produce the mats, which intrinsically have larger specific surface to volume ratio and smaller pores than traditional fibers. Fibrous mats are typically used in a wide variety of industries such as filter media, tissue engineering, and sensors. Chitosan, the N-deacetylated derivative of chitin, is environmentally friendly, non-toxic, biodegradable, and anti-bacterial. However, due to chitosan’s solubility in aqueous acids, it is electrospun using trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). Modified chitosans, such as carboxymethylchitosan, are currently under investigation as a means of creating designed nanofibrous mats with specific chemistries. However, typically an entirely new set of electrospinning conditions has to be developed for each novel chemistry due to differences in solubility and viscosity. In the present study, we have electrospun chitosan mats and post-processed the fibers. Two different post-processing conditions were employed. One post-production procedure, featuring vapor-phase glutaraldehyde, effectively crosslinks the fiber mats utilizing a Schiff base imine functionality. In another post-processing procedure, the as-spun mats are solution-phase post-processed by chemically functionalizing the mats with cyano, carboxylic acids and thiol groups. While both methods maintained fiber shape and characteristics, there is a definite increase in fiber diameters due to processing. FTIR, NMR, SEM and tensile testing have been performed on the pre- or post-processed fiber mats. Investigations into the percent modification are currently underway.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Welsh, E.R., Schauer, C.L., Qadri, S.B., and Price, R.R.. Biomacromolecules, 3, 1370 (2002).10.1021/bm025625zGoogle Scholar
2. Schiffman, J.D. and Schauer, C.L.. Biomacromolecules, 8, 2665 (2007).10.1021/bm7006983Google Scholar
3. Schiffman, J.D. and Schauer, C.L.. Biomacromolecules, 8, 594 (2007).10.1021/bm060804sGoogle Scholar
4. Duncan, R.J.S., Weston, P.D., and Wrigglesworth, R.. Anal. Biochem., 132, 68 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Masuko, T., Minami, A., Iwasaki, N., Majima, T., Nishimura, S.I., and Lee, Y.C.. Biomacromolecules, 6, 880 (2005).Google Scholar
6. Cathell, M.D., Szewczyk, J.C., Bui, F.A., Weber, C.A., Wolever, J.D., Kang, J., and Schauer, C.L.. Biomacromolecules, 9, 289 (2008).Google Scholar
7. Welsh, E.R., Schauer, C.L., Santos, J.P., and Price, R.R.. Langmuir, 20, 1807 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Chiou, M.S. and Li, H.Y.. Chemosphere, 50, 1095 (2003).10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00636-7Google Scholar
9. Ngah, W.S.W., Endud, C.S., and Mayanar, R.. React. Funct. Polym., 50, 181 (2002).10.1016/S1381-5148(01)00113-4Google Scholar
10. Zheng, H., Du, Y.M., Yu, J.H., and Xiao, L.. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities-Chinese, 21, 809 (2000).Google Scholar
11. Lee, S.H. and Kim, Y.. Carbohydr. Polym., 70, 53 (2007).Google Scholar
12. Lee, S.H., Park, S.Y., and Choi, J.H.. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 92, 2054 (2004).10.1002/app.20160Google Scholar
13. Wei, Y.C., Hudson, S.M., Mayer, J.M., and Kaplan, D.L.. Journal of Polymer Science Part a-Polymer Chemistry, 30, 2187 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Goycoolea, F.M., Heras, A., Aranaz, I., Galed, G., Fernandez-Valle, M.E., and Arguelles-Monal, W.. Macromol. Biosci., 3, 612 (2003).10.1002/mabi.200300011Google Scholar