Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:54:36.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nanoscale Origins of Spider Dragline Mechanical Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jessika E. Trancik ,
Jan T. Czernuszka ,
Fraser I. Bell  and
Christopher Viney
Jessika E. Trancik
Affiliation:
Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom.
Jan T. Czernuszka
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom.
Fraser I. Bell
Affiliation:
Chemistry, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.
Christopher Viney
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom. Chemistry, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United Kingdom. School of Engineering, University of California at Merced, Merced, CA 95344, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Several mechanical models, in which a material is treated as a composite of crystalline and amorphous and/or interphase material, were used to predict the tensile modulus of spider dragline along the fiber direction. The models included the Voigt average (which assumes that the fibers/crystals are continuous, and that the strain is the same in all components of the composite); a modified Halpin-Tsai model (which is suitable for predicting the longitudinal elastic modulus for short aligned fiber composites, and is thus more appropriate for silk); and the shear-lag or Cox model (which is a modification of the Voigt average that takes into account a discontinuous nature of stiff fibers/crystals and the resulting shear stress in the amorphous matrix). The latter two models yielded close approximations of an experimentally measured elastic modulus of Latrodectus hesperus (black widow spider) dragline under conditions of controlled temperature and humidity, given realistic inputs for the moduli of the individual components and the percent crystallinity. A literature model for the stress-strain behavior of silk [1] was also considered, in the context of our experimental results from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies of L. hesperus dragline. TEM and XRD results indicated a bimodal size distribution of ordered regions; one population of crystals has a mean size of 2 nm, and another spans the size range 40–120 nm. The average elastic modulus measured from L. hesperus dragline is 23 GPa - close to the 25 GPa theoretical modulus for the case of large crystals in Termonia's model. The tensile strength of L. hesperus dragline is ca. 1.7 GPa, close to the case predicted for small crystals in Termonia's model. A combination of the small and large crystals could explain the forced elongation behavior of L. hesperus dragline.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 844: Symposium Y – Mechanical Properties of Bio-Inspired and Biological Materials , 2004 , Y4.7
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Termonia, Y., Macromolecules 27, 7378–7381 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Haider, M., Megeed, Z., and Ghandehari, H., Journal of Controlled Release 95, 1–26 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Trancik, J. E., Czernuszka, J. T., Bell, F. I., Viney, C., ‘Nanostructural features of a spider dragline silk as revealed by electron and X-ray diffraction studies', submitted to Polymer.Google Scholar
4. Trancik, J. E., Czernuszka, J. T., Merriman, C., Viney, C., Journal of Microscopy 203, 235–238 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Trancik, J. E., Silk microstructures, University of Oxford, D.Phil. Thesis, 2000.Google Scholar
6. Trancik, J. E., Czernuszka, J. T., Cockayne, D., Viney, C., ‘Nanostructural information derived from the unit cell scattering amplitudes of a spider dragline silk', submitted to Polymer.Google Scholar
7. Kaplan, D. L., Lombardi, S. J., Muller, W. S., Fossey, S. A., in Biomaterials, Novel Materials from Biological Sources, edited by Byrom, D. (Macmillan Publishers Limited, 1991), pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
8. Treloar, L. R. G., Polymer 1, 290–303 (1960)Google Scholar
9. Nakamae, K., Nishino, T., and Ohkubo, H., Polymer 30, 1243–1246 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Becker, M. A., Mahoney, D. V., Lenhert, P. G., Eby, R. K., Kaplan, D., Adams, W. W., in Silk polymers, edited by Kaplan, D., Adams, W. W., Farmer, B., Viney, C. (American Chemical Society, 1994), pp. 185–195.Google Scholar
11. Pérez-Rigueiro, J., Viney, C., Llorca, J., Elices, M., Polymer 41, 8433–8439 (2000).Google Scholar
12. Fossey, S. A. and Tripathy, S., International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 24, 119–125 (1999).Google Scholar
13. Grubb, D. T. and Jelinski, L. W., Macromolecules 30, 2860–2867 (1997).Google Scholar
14. Riekel, C., Branden, C., Craig, C., Ferrero, C., Heidelbach, F., Muller, M., International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 24, 179–186 (1999).Google Scholar