Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T09:30:13.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Model for Asymmetric Hysteresis in Piezoceramic Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R.C. Smith  and
Z. Ounaies
R.C. Smith
Affiliation:
CRSC, Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, [email protected]
Z. Ounaies
Affiliation:
ICASE, Mail Stop 132C, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper focuses on the characterization of hysteresis exhibited by piezoelectric materials at moderate to high field levels. For soft materials in which dipoles are easily reconfigured, the hysteresis loop is observed to be rotationally symmetric about the zero field, zero polarization point and symmetric models can be employed. In harder materials, however, the loops are no longer rotationally symmetric which necessitates the development of commensurate characterization techniques. The model considered here is based upon the quantification of reversible and irreversible changes in polarization due to bending and translation of domain walls pinned at inclusions inherent to the materials. The performance of the model is illustrated through comparison with PZT4 data

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 604: Symposium LL – Materials for Smart Systems III , 1999 , 285
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Chen, I-W. and Wang, Y., Ferroelectrics, 206, 1998, pp. 245–263.10.1080/00150199808009162Google Scholar
[2] Chen, W. and Lynch, C.S., J. of Intell. Mater. Syst. and Struct., 9, 1998, pp. 427–431.10.1177/1045389X9800900604Google Scholar
[3] Galinaitis, W.S. and Rogers, R.C., SPIE Conference on Mathematics and Control in Smart Structures, San Diego, CA, 1997.Google Scholar
[4] Ge, P. and Jouaneh, M., Precision Engineering, 17, 1995, pp. 211–221.10.1016/0141-6359(95)00002-UGoogle Scholar
[5] Jiles, D.C. and Atherton, D.L., J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 61, 1986, pp. 48–60.10.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-1Google Scholar
[6] Laikhtman, B.D., Soviet Physics Solid State, 15(1), 1973, pp. 62–68.Google Scholar
[7] Main, J.A., Garcia, E. and Newton, D.V., Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 18(5), 1995, pp. 1068–1073.10.2514/3.21506Google Scholar
[8] Omura, M., Adachi, H. and Ishibashi, Y., Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 30(9B), 1991, pp. 2384–2387.10.1143/JJAP.30.2384Google Scholar
[9] Smith, R.C., CRSC Technical Report CRSC-TR98-36; Mathematical and Computer Mod-eling, to appear.Google Scholar
[10] Smith, R.C. and Hoin, C.L., SPIE Conference on Mathematics and Control in Smart Structures, SPIE Volume 3667, Newport Beach, CA, March 1-4, 1999, pp. 150–161.Google Scholar
[11] Smith, R.C. and Hoin, C.L., CRSC Technical Report CRSC-TR99-1; J. of Intell. Mater. Syst. and Struct., to appear.Google Scholar
[12] Smith, R.C. and Ounaies, Z., ICASE Report 99-29; Proc. of the ASME Int. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nashville, TN, November, 1999, to appear.Google Scholar
[13] Smith, R.C. and Ounaies, Z., CRSC Technical Report CRSC-TR99-33; J. of Intell. Mater.Syst. and Struct., submitted.Google Scholar
[14] Tao, G. and Kokotović, P.V., Adaptive Control of Systems with Actuator and Sensor Nonlinearities, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
[15] Zhang, X.D. and Rogers, C.A., J. of Intell. Mater. Syst. and Struct., 4, 1993, pp. 307–316.10.1177/1045389X9300400303Google Scholar