Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:13:43.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metallurgical By-Product Transformation and Its Plasma Modification to Increase HDPE Thermal Conductivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

Y. Olivares-Maldonado ,
E. F Ramírez-Vargas ,
L. Ramos-deValle ,
Y. A. Perera-Mercado  and
M. G. Neira-Velázquez
Y. Olivares-Maldonado
Affiliation:
Department of Polymer Processing, Research Center for Applied Chemistry, Saltillo, México.
E. F Ramírez-Vargas
Affiliation:
Department of Polymer Processing, Research Center for Applied Chemistry, Saltillo, México.
L. Ramos-deValle
Affiliation:
Department of Polymer Processing, Research Center for Applied Chemistry, Saltillo, México.
Y. A. Perera-Mercado
Affiliation:
Department of Advanced Materials, Research Center for Applied Chemistry, Saltillo, México.
M. G. Neira-Velázquez
Affiliation:
Department of Advanced Materials, Research Center for Applied Chemistry, Saltillo, México.
Get access

Abstract

A metallurgical by product mostly constituted of Wustita (FeO) was transformed to Magnetite (Fe3O4) spheres using a flame treatment. Then magnetite spheres surface was modified by cold plasma treatment with ethylene, where a thin polyethylene film was deposited on the spheres surface. Finally, HDPE composites with modified spheres were obtained by melt mixing and its thermal conductivity was determined by MDSC. It was found that spheres surface modification helps to increase composites thermal conductivity.

Keywords

thermal conductivitypolymer compositeplasma
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1765: Symposium 4A – Advanced Structural Materials—2014 , 2015 , pp. 23 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Sarrabi, S., Colin, X. and Tcharkhtchi, A., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 118, 980–996 (2010).Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. and Satapathy, A., Procedia Eng. 51, 573–579 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagchi, A. and Nomura, S., Compos. Sci. Technol. 66, 1703–1712 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamm, M., Polymer Surfaces and Interfaces, 1st ed. (Springer, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neira-Velázquez, M.G., Ramos-deValle, L.F., Hernández-Hernández, E. and Zapata-González, I., e- Polym. 8, 1855–1865 (2013).Google Scholar
Ramos-deValle, L.F., Neira-Velázquez, M.G. and Hernández-Hernández, E., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 107, 1893–1899 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picasso, G., Vega, J., Uzuriaga, R. and Ruiz, G.P., Rev. Soc. Quím. Perú 78, 170-182 (2012).Google Scholar
Shenogin, S., Xue, L., Ozisik, R., Keblinski, T. and Cahill, D.G., J Appl Phys 95, 8136–8144 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar