Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:44:32.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanistic Effects of Deuteration on the Aqueous Corrosion of Nuclear Waste Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

X. Feng
Affiliation:
The Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D. C. 20064.
L. Fu
Affiliation:
The Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D. C. 20064.
T. K. Choudhury
Affiliation:
The Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D. C. 20064.
I. L. Pegg
Affiliation:
The Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D. C. 20064.
P. B. Macedo
Affiliation:
The Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D. C. 20064.
Get access

Abstract

Isotopically labeled water has been utilized by several researchers to help elucidate the glass dissolution mechanism in aqueous media. However, most of the results have been obtained with simple silicate glasses and have utilized low surface-to-volume (S/V) ratios and relatively short time scales. In this paper we report the results of an extensive study of the leach behavior of the preliminary West Valley nuclear waste glass composition, WV205, in deuterium oxide using multiple S/V ratios at both short and long times. The WV205 glass was leached in parallel in both ordinary deionized water and in deuterated water at five S/V ratios (20, 100, 200, 2000 and 6000 m−1) at 90°C under PCT (the SRL-modified MCC3 procedure) conditions with sampling at 1, 3, 7, 28, 56, 120 days, and four times annually thereafter; the tests will continue for several years. Initial rates were determined by measurements at shorter times with polished monoliths. A significant isotope effect, as measured by the ratio of leach rates, RH20/RD20, was found at all S/V ratios and reached values as large as 360%. Our data yield different values for RH20/RD20 in the diffusion, matrix dissolution, and saturation dominated regimes with the largest effect in the middle stage. Large values of RH20/RD20 would be characteristic of a primary kinetic isotope effect suggestive of a bond breakage involving hydrogen in the rate determining step.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pederson, L.R., Baer, D.R., McVay, G.L., and Engelhard, M.H., “Reaction of Soda Lime Silicate Glass in Isotopically Labelled Water,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 86, 369 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Kumar, B., “Isotope Exchange Reactions in Glasses,” XIV Int. Congress on Glass, 1986, New Delhi, Collected papers, Vol. 2, 370.Google Scholar
3. Frischat, G.H. et al., “Initial Stages of Aqueous Glass Corrosion,” XIV Int. Congress on Glass, 1986, New Delhi, Collected papers, Vol. 2, 327.Google Scholar
4. Lapham, K.E., Holloway, J.R. and Delaney, J.R., “Diffusion of H2O and D2O in Obsidian at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 67, 179 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Jantzen, C.M. and Bibler, N.E., “Nuclear Waste Glass Product Consistency Test (PCT) Method. Version 3.0,” Savannah River Laboratory, November 20, 1989.Google Scholar
6. Covington, A.K., Paabo, M., Robinson, R.A., and Bates, R.G., “Use of the Glass Electrode in Deuterium Oxide and the Relationship between the Standardized pD (paD) Scale and the Operational pH in Heavy Water,” Analytical Chem., 40, 700 (1968).Google Scholar
7. Bourcier, W.L. and Knauss, K.G., data presented at 92nd Ann. Meet. ACerS, Dallas, TX, April 1990.Google Scholar
8. Feng, X., Pegg, I.L., Guo, Y., Barkatt, Aa., and Macedo, P.B., “Effects of Surface Area-to-Solution Volume Ratio on Chemical Durability of Nuclear Waste Glasses,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, Ed. Oversby, V. M. and Brown, P.W., 383 (1990).Google Scholar
9. “Isotope Effects in Chemical Reactions”, Ed. Collins, C. J. and Bowman, S., Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
10. Bunton, C.A. and Shiner, V.J. Jr., “Isotope Effects in Deuterium Oxide Solution. I. Acid Base Equilibria,” J. Am. Chem. Soc, 83, 42 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Bunton, C.A. and Shiner, V.J. Jr., “Isotope Effects in Deuterium Oxide Solution. Part II. Reaction Rates in Acid, Alkaline and Neutral Solution, Involving only Secondary Solvent Effects,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83, 3207 (1961).Google Scholar
12. White, W.B., Advances in Ceramics, 20, 431 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Plodinec, M.J., Wicks, G.G. and Bibler, N.E., “An assessment of Savannah River Borosilicate Glass in the Repository Environment,” DP-1629, Savannah River Laboratory, 1982.Google Scholar
14. Knauss, K.G., Bourcier, W.L., McKeegan, K.D., Merzbacher, C.I., Nguyen, S.N., Ryerson, J., Smith, D.K., Weed, H.C. and Newton, L., “Dissolution of a Simple Analogue Nuclear Waste Glass as a Function of pH, Time, and Temperature,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, Ed. Oversby, V. M. and Brown, P.W., 371 (1990).Google Scholar
15. Grambow, B., “A General Rate Equation for Nuclear Waste Glass Corrosion,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, Ed. Jantzen, C. M., Stone, J.A., and Ewing, R.C., p. 15 (1985).Google Scholar
16. Feng, X., Pegg, I.L., and Macedo, P.B., J. Mat. Res., in preparation.Google Scholar