Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:36:10.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanisms of Oxidation of Fuel Cladding Alloys Revealed by High Resolution APT, TEM and SIMS Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2012

Chris R. M. Grovenor
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
Na Ni
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Imperial College, London, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
Daniel Hudson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
Sean S. Yardley
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
Katie L. Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
George D. W. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
Sergio Lozano-Perez
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
John M. Sykes
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
Get access

Abstract

Aqueous corrosion of zirconium alloys has become the major factor limiting prolonged fuel campaigns in nuclear plant. Studies using SEM, TEM and electrochemical impedance measurements have been interpreted as showing a dense inner-most oxide layer, and an increased thickness of the layer has been correlated to a better corrosion resistance. Many authors have reported that an ‘intermediate layer’ at the metal oxide interface has a complex structure or/and stochiometry different to that of both the bulk oxide and bulk metal, sometimes claimed to be a suboxide phase. Diffraction evidence has suggested the presence of both cubic ZrO and rhombohedral Zr3O phases, and compositional analysis has revealed similar variations in local oxygen stoichiometry.

We have carried out a systematic investigation of the structure and chemistry of the metal/oxide interface in samples of commercial ZIRLO corroded for times up to 180 days. We have developed new experimental techniques for the study of these interfaces both by Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) analysis in the Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) and by Atom Probe Tomography (APT), and exactly the same samples have been investigated by both techniques. Our results show the development of a clearly defined suboxide layer of stoichiometry close to ZrO, and the subsequent disappearance of this layer at the first of the characteristic ‘breakaway’ transitions in the oxidation kinetics. We can correlate this behaviour with changes in the structure of the oxide layer, and particularly the development of interconnected porosity that links the corroding interface with the aqueous environment. Using high resolution SIMS analysis of isotopically spiked samples we demonstrate the penetration of the oxidising species through these porous outer oxide layers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Sabol, G. P., “ZIRLOTM - An Alloy Development Success”, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Fourteenth International Symposium, ed. Rudling, P. and Kammenzind, B. (American Society for Testing and Materials, Sweden, 2005) pp. 224.Google Scholar
[2] Cox, B., Journal of Nuclear Materials, 336, 331 (2005)Google Scholar
[3] Pickman, D. O., “Zirconium Alloy Performance in Light Water Reactors: A Review of UK and Scandinavian Experience”, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Tenth International Symposium, ed. Garde, A.M. and Bradley, E.R. (ASTM STP 1245, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1994), pp. 19-32.Google Scholar
[4] Nikulina, A. V., Metal Science and Heat Treatment, 45, 287 (2003)Google Scholar
[5] Lustman, B. and Kerze, F., The Metallurgy of Zirconium, (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Michigan, 1955).Google Scholar
[6] Beie, H.-J., Mitwalsky, A., Garzarolli, F., Ruhmann, H., Sell, H.-J., “Examinations of the Corrosion Mechanism of Zirconium Alloys”, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Tenth International Symposium, ed. Garde, A.M. and Bradley, E.R. (ASTM International, Baltimore, MD, 1993), pp. 615643.Google Scholar
[7] Lemaignan, C., “Corrosion of Zirconium Alloy Components in Light Water Reactors”, ASM Handbook, 13C Corrosion: Environments and Industries (2006) 415420.Google Scholar
[8] Ahmed, T., Keys, L.H., Journal of the Less-Common Metals, 39, 99 (1975)Google Scholar
[9] Park, D. J., Park, J. Y., Jeong, Y. H., Lee, J. Y., Journal of Nuclear Materials, 399, 208 (2010)Google Scholar
[10] Ploc, R. A., Journal of Nuclear Materials, 91, 322 (1980)Google Scholar
[11] Maroto, A. J. G., Bordoni, R., Villegas, M., Olmedo, A. M., Blesa, M. A., Iglesias, A., Koenig, P.,, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 229, 79 (1996)Google Scholar
[12] Bossis, P., Lelièvre, G., Barberis, P., Iltis, X., Lefebvre, F., Thomas, L., Maguire, M., “Multi-scale characterization of the metal-oxide interface of zirconium alloys”, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Twelfth International Symposium, ed. Sabol, G. P. and Moan, G. D. (ASTM International, 2000), pp. 918945.Google Scholar
[13] Kubo, T., Uno, M., “Precipitate Behavior in Zircaloy-2 Oxide-Films and Its Relevance to Corrosion-Resistance”, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Ninth International Symposium, ed. Eucken, C. M. and Garde, A. M. (ASTM International, 1990), pp. 476496.Google Scholar
[14] Ni, N., Lozano-Perez, S., Jenkins, M.L., English, C., Smith, G.D.W., Sykes, J.M., Grovenor, C.R.M., Scripta Materialia, 62, 564 (2010)Google Scholar
[15] Wadman, B., Lai, Z., Nystrom, H. -O., Nyström, L.-A., Rudling, P., Pettersson, H., “Microstructure of Oxide Layers Formed During Autoclave Testing of Zirconium Alloys”, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Tenth International Symposium, ed. Garde, A. M. and Bradley, E. R. (ASTM International, Baltimore, MD, 1993), pp. 579598.Google Scholar
[16] Wikmark, G., Rudling, P., Lehtinen, B., Hutchinson, B., Oscarsson, A., Ahlberg, E., “The Importance of Oxide Morphology for the Oxidation Rate of Zirconium Alloys”, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Eleventh International Symposium, ed. Bradley, E.R. and Sabol, G.P. (ASTM STP 1295, 1996), pp. 5573.Google Scholar
[17] Yilmazbayhan, A., Breval, E., Motta, A. T., Comstock, R. J., Journal of Nuclear Materials, 349, 265 (2006)Google Scholar
[18] Iltis, X. and Michel, H., Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 177, 71 (1991)Google Scholar
[19] Abolhassani, S., Barta, G., Jakobb, A., Journal of Nuclear Materials, 399, 1 (2010)Google Scholar
[20] Foord, D. T., Newcomb, S. B., “Instabilities in the Oxidation Behaviour of Zircaloy-4”, Microscopy of Oxidation-2, ed. Newcomb, S. B. and Bennett, M. J. (The institute of Materials, 1993), pp. 374386.Google Scholar
[21] Furuta, T., Motohashi, H., Journal of Nuclear Materials, 95, 303 (1980)Google Scholar
[22] Anada, H., Takeda, K., “Microstructure of Oxides on Zircaloy-4, 1.0Nb Zircaloy-4, and Zircaloy-2 Formed in 10.3-MPa Steam at 673 K”, Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Eleventh International Symposium, ed. Bradley, E. R. and Sabol, G. P. (American Society for Testing and Materials, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, 1995), pp. 3554.Google Scholar
[23] Lozano-Perez, S., Micron, 39 ,320 (2008)Google Scholar
[24] Ni, N., Lozano-Perez, S., Sykes, J., Grovenor, C., Ultramicroscopy, 111, 123 (2010)Google Scholar
[25] Miller, M. K., Russell, K. F., Thompson, G. B., Ultramicroscopy, 102, 287 (2005)Google Scholar
[26] Banerjee, S. and Mukhopadhyay, P., Phase Transformations: Examples from Titanium and Zirconium Alloys, (Pergamon, Oxford, 2007).Google Scholar
[27] Ishii, Y., Sykes, J.M., Materials at High Temperatures, 17, 23 (2000)Google Scholar
[28] Foord, D. T., Newcomb, S.B., “The Microstructural Characterization of Factors Which Determine the Degradation Behaviour of Zircaloy-4”, Microscopy of Oxidation 3, ed. Newcomb, S.B. and Little, J.A. (Henry Ling Ltd. Dorset, UK 1996), pp. 488498.Google Scholar