Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:34:43.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical Properties of Tin Thin Films Measured using Nanoindentation and Bulge Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

O.R. Shojaei  and
A. Karimi
O.R. Shojaei
Affiliation:
Département de Physique Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
A. Karimi
Affiliation:
Département de Physique Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

To provide comparative assessment for bulge test and indentation mechanical properties, titanium nitride (TiNx) thin films deposited in a r.f. magnetron sputtering system were subjected to both measurements. For this purpose thin layers of titanium nitride (t = 400–700 nm) were grown on the Si(100) wafers containing a layer of free standing low stress (LPCVD) silicon nitride. The composite membranes made of silicon nitride and TiNx were bulged and by means of the rule of mixture formula the mechanical properties of TiNx thin films were extracted. These measurements allowed to investigate the variation of Young's modulus, hardness, and residual stresses of TiNx films versus deposition parameters such as the nitrogen partial pressure and substrate bias voltage. It was found that, at low negative bias (≤ -15 V) stoichiometric thin films of low density and in tensile stress are deposited. Increasing the negative bias increases the initially tensile residual stress to a maximum, then drops to zero and converts to the compressive stress which grows again with further negative bias. At the same time, both modulus and hardness rise monotonously with the substrate bias without any abrupt changes. The nanoindentation modulus extracted from dynamically loading-unloading curves was found to be comparable to the bulge test measurements for denser coatings, but noticeably higher than the bulge test data for porous coatings. The morphology of TiNx films were observed using scanning electron microscopy and the relationships between microstructural evolution of columns and the mechanical properties of coatings are discussed in terms of deposition parameters.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 522: Symposium T – Fundamentals of Nanoindentation & Nanotribology , 1998 , 245
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Vlassak, J.J., Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 7(12), 4242–3248 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Tabata, O., Kahawata, K., Sugiyama, S., Sensors and Actuators, 20 135–141 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Karimi, A., Shojaci, O.R., Martin, J.L., Thin Solid Films, 308–309, 334–339 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Oliver, W.C., Pharr, G.M., Mater, J.. Res. 7(6), 1564–1583 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Mencik, J., Swain, M.V., Mater, J.. Res. Vol.10, No. 6, 1491–1501 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Nix, W.D., Mater. Sci. Eng. A234–236, 37–44 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Khakani, M.A. El, Jean, A., Boily, S., and Kieffer, J.C., Mater, J.. Res. 9(12), 96–103 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Elsener, F., Ehrlich, A. et al., F. Richter, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12(2), 476–483 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Pecz, B., Frangis, N., Logothetidis, S., Alexandrou, I., Thin Solid Films 268, 57–63 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Kubo, Y., Hashimoto, M., Surf. Coat. Technol. 49, 342–347 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Muller, D., Fromm, E., Thin Solid Films 270, 411–416 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Török, E., Perry, A.J., Cholet, L., Sproul, W.D., Thin Solid Films 153, 37–43 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Sundgren, J.E., Johansson, B.O. et al., Thin Solid Films, 105 367–384 (1983).Google Scholar
14. Sundgren, J.E., Johansson, B.O., Hentzell, H.T., Thin Solid Films 105, 385–393 (1983).Google Scholar
15. Eser, E., Ogilvie, R.E., Taylor, K.A., Thin Solid Films 67, 265–277 (1980).Google Scholar
16. Bland, R.D., Kominiak, G.J., Mattox, D. M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11(4), 528–532 (1974).Google Scholar
17. Cuomo, J.J., Cambino, R.J., Rosenberg, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11(1), 34–40 (1974).Google Scholar
18. Cai, X., Bangert, H., Thin Solid Films 264, 59–71 (1995).Google Scholar