Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T00:01:41.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Materials for Shielding Astronauts from the Hazards of Space Radiations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. W. Wilson ,
F. A. Cucinotta ,
J. Miller ,
J. L. Shinn ,
S. A. Thibeault ,
R. C. Singleterry ,
L. C. Simonsen  and
M. H. Kim
J. W. Wilson
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23682, [email protected]
F. A. Cucinotta
Affiliation:
NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058
J. Miller
Affiliation:
DOE Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
J. L. Shinn
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23682, [email protected]
S. A. Thibeault
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23682, [email protected]
R. C. Singleterry
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23682, [email protected]
L. C. Simonsen
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23682, [email protected]
M. H. Kim
Affiliation:
NRC/NAS Fellow NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23682
Get access

Abstract

One major obstacle to human space exploration is the possible limitations imposed by the adverse effects of long-term exposure to the space environment. Even before human spaceflight began, the potentially brief exposure of astronauts to the very intense random solar energetic particle (SEP) events was of great concern. A new challenge appears in deep space exploration from exposure to the low-intensity heavy-ion flux of the galactic cosmic rays (GCR) since the missions are of long duration and the accumulated exposures can be high. Because cancer induction rates increase behind low to rather large thickness of aluminum shielding according to available biological data on mammalian exposures to GCR like ions, the shield requirements for a Mars mission are prohibitively expensive in terms of mission launch costs. Preliminary studies indicate that materials with high hydrogen content and low atomic number constituents are most efficient in protecting the astronauts. This occurs for two reasons: the hydrogen is efficient in breaking up the heavy GCR ions into smaller less damaging fragments and the light constituents produce few secondary radiations (especially few biologically damaging neutrons). An overview of the materials related issues and their impact on human space exploration will be given.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 551: Symposium JJ – Materials in Space-Science, Technology & Exploration , 1998 , 3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Badhwar, G. D., Cucinotta, F. A., O‘Neill, P. M., Radiat. Res. 134, 9 (1993).Google Scholar
2 Smart, D. F., Shea, M. A., J. Spacecraft and Rockets 26, 403 (1989).Google Scholar
3 Wilson, J. W., Denn, F. M., Preliminary Analysts of the Implications of Natural Radiations on Geostationary Operations. NASA TN D-8290, 1976.Google Scholar
4 Stassenopolous, E. G. in High-energy Radiation Background in Space, edited by Rester, A. C., Trombka, J. I., AIP Conference Proceedings 186, New York, 3, 1986.Google Scholar
5 Wu, H., Atwell, W., Cucinotta, F. A., Yang, C., Estimate of Space Radiation-Induced Cancer Risks for International Space Station. NASA TM- 104818, 1996.Google Scholar
6 National Council on Radiation Protection, Guidance on Radiation Received in Space Activities. NCRP Report No. 98, 1989.Google Scholar
7 National Academy of Science, Radiation Hazards to Crews of Interplanetary Missions: Biological Issues and Research Strategies. NAS Press, Washington DC, 1996.Google Scholar
8 Wilson, J. W., Miller, J., Konradi, A., Cucinotta, F. A., eds., Shielding Strategies for Human Space Exploration, NASA CP-3360, 1997.Google Scholar
9 Mewalt, R. A., Interplanetary Particle Environment, Publ. 88-28, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, 112, 1988.Google Scholar
10 Simpson, J. A., Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 33 p. 323 (1983).Google Scholar
11 International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1990 Recommendations of the ICRP, ICRP Publication No. 60, Pergamon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
12 Wilson, J. W., Cucinotta, F. A., Shinn, J. L., Cell Kinetics and Track Structure, Biological Effects and Physics of Solar and Galactic Cosmic Radiation, Part A, eds. Swenberg, C. E. et al. , Press, pp. 295–338, 1993.Google Scholar
13 Yang, T. C., Craise, L. M., Biological Response to Heavy Ion Exposures. In Shielding Strategies for Human Space Exploration. Eds. Wilson, J. W. et al. Chpt. 6, pp. 91–109, NASA CP 3360, 1997.Google Scholar
14 Cucinotta, F. A., Wilson, J. W., Katz, R., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 69, 593 (1995).Google Scholar
15 Cucinotta, F. A., Wilson, J. W., Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 1811 (1994).Google Scholar
16 Alpen, E. L. et al. Radiat. Res. 136, 382 (1993), Adv. Sp. Res. 14, 573 (1994).Google Scholar
17 Cucinotta, F. A. et al. Computational Procedures and Database Development. In Shielding Strategies for Human Space Exploration. Eds. Wilson, J. W. et al. Chpt. 8, pp. 91–109, NASA CP 3360, 1997.Google Scholar
18 Tai, H. et al. Comparison of stopping power and range databases for radiation transport study. NASA TP 3644, 1997.Google Scholar
19 Miller, J. et al. Acta Astronautica 42, 389 (1998).Google Scholar
20 Wilson, J. W. et al. Adv. Space Res. 14(10), p. 841 (1994).Google Scholar
21 Alsmiller, R. G., Irving, D. C., Kinney, W. E., and Moran, H. S., “The validity of the straightahead approximation in space vehicle shielding studies,” In Second Symposium on Protection Against Radiations in Space. Reetz, A., ed. NASA SP-71, pp. 177–181; 1965.Google Scholar
22 Wilson, J. W. et al. , HZETRN: Description of a free-space ion and nucleon transport and shielding computer program. NASA TP 3495, 1995.Google Scholar
23 Wilson, J. W. et al. Health Phys. 68, 50 (1995).Google Scholar
24 Letaw, J. R., Silberberg, R., and Tsao, C. H., “Radiation haxards on space missions outside the magnetosphere.” Adv. Space Res. 9(10), p. 285 (1989).Google Scholar
25 Wilson, J. W., Townsend, L. W., and Badavi, F. F., “A semiempirical nuclear fragmentation model” Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys Res. B 18, 225 (1987).Google Scholar
26 Wilson, J. W., Shinn, J. L., Townsend, L. W., Tripathi, R. K., Badavi, F. F., and Chun, S. Y., “NUCFRG2: A semiempirical nuclear fragmentation model” Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys Res. B 94, 95 (1995).Google Scholar
27 Cucinotta, F. A., Townsend, L. W., Wilson, J. W., Shinn, J. L., Badhwar, G. D., and Dubey, R. R., “Light ion components of the galactic cosmic rays: Nuclear interactions and transport theory” Adv. Space Res. 17(2), p. 77 (1996).Google Scholar