Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:47:01.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetostrictive Composite Material Systems Analytical/Experimental

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. A. Duenas ,
L. Hsu  and
G. P. Cakman
T. A. Duenas
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095–1597, [email protected]
L. Hsu
Affiliation:
Hughes Space and Communications Company, Los Angeles, California 90030–9009, Post Office Box 92919, [email protected]
G. P. Cakman
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095–1597, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Experimental and theoretical results are presented for a composite magnetostrictive material system. This material system contains Terfenol-D particles blended with a binder resin and cured in the presence of a magnetic field to form a 1–3 composite. Test data indicates that the magnetostrictive material can be preloaded in-situ with the binder matrix resulting in orientation of domains that facilitate strain responses comparable to monolithic Terfenol-D. Two constitutive equations for the monolithic material are described and a concentric cylinders model is used to predict the response of the composite structure. Experimental data obtained from the composite systems coincide with the analytical models within 10%. Particle size, resin system, and volume fraction are shown to significantly influence the response of the fabricated composite system.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 459: Symposium Y – Materials for Smart Systems II , 1996 , 527
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Legvold, S., Alstad., J., & Rhyne, J., “Giant Magnetostriction in Dysprosium and Holmium Single Crystals”, Phys. Rev. Lett., V. 10, pp. 509, 1963.Google Scholar
2. Clark, A.E., Bozorth., R., and DeSavage, , “Anomalous Thermal Expansion and Magnetostriction of Single Crystals of Dysprosium”, B., Phys. lett, V. 5, pp. 100, 1963.Google Scholar
3. Clark, A.E., and Belson, , “Giant Room-Temperature Magnetostrictions in TbFe2 and DyFe2 ”, Phys. Rev., V. B5, pp. 3642, 1972.Google Scholar
4. Millot, T.A. and Friedmann, P.P.. 1994. “Magnetostrictively Actuated Control Flaps for Vibration Reduction in Helicopter Rotors”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Materials, June 1994, Colonial Williamsburg, VA., pp. 900–913.Google Scholar
5. IEEE Standard on Magnetostrictive Materials: Piezomagnetic Nomenclature, no. 319, 1971.Google Scholar
6. Clark, A.E. 1992. “High Power Rare Earth Magnetostrictive Materials,” Recent Advances in Adaptive and Sensory Materials and their Applications, Blacksburg, VA., pp. 387–398.Google Scholar
7. Brown, , Fuller, William, Magnetoelastic interactions. Springer-Verlang, 1966.Google Scholar
8. Carman, G.P. and Mitrovic, M.. “Nonlinear Constitutive Relations for Magnetostrictive Materials with Applications to 1-D Problems”, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, V. 6. no. 5, Sept. 1995, pp. 673–684.Google Scholar
9. Kannan, K.S., and Dasgupta, A., “Continuum Magnetoelastic Properties of Terfenol-D; What is available and what is needed”, Adaptive Materials Symposium, Summer meeting of ASME-AMD-MD, UCLA 1995.Google Scholar
10. Cao, W., Zhang, Q.M., and Cross, L.E., 1992. “Theoretical Study on the Static Performance of Piezoelectric Ceramic-Polymer Composites with 1–3 Connectivity”, J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 72 no. 12, Dec. 1992, pp. 5814–5821.Google Scholar
11. Bowen, C.P., Shrout, T.R., Randall, C.A., of the Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory at Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, “Intelligent Processing of Composite Materials”, Ad-Vol. 35, Adaptive Structures and Material Systems, ASME 1993.Google Scholar
12. Bi, J. and Anjanappa, M., 1994. “Investigation of Active Vibration Damping Using Magnetostrictive Mini Actuators”, Smart Structures and Intelligent Syst., Orlando FL, V. 2190, pp. 171–180.Google Scholar
13. Roberts, M., Mitrovic, M., and Carman, G.P., “Nonlinear Behavior of Coupled Magnetostrictive Material Systems Analytical/Experimental”, Smart Materials, San Diego 1995, pp. 341–355, 1995.Google Scholar
14. Sandlund, L., Fahlander, M., Cedell, T., Clark, A.E., Restorff, J.B., and Wun-Fogle, M., “Magnetostriction, elastic moduli, and coupling factors of composite Terfenol-D”, J. Appl. Phys., May 1994.Google Scholar
15. Horn, C.L. and Shanker, N., “A Fully Coupled Constitutive Model for Electrostrictive Ceramic Materials”, Second International Conference on Intelligent Materials, ICIM'94, pp. 623–634.Google Scholar
16. Hashin, Z., and Rosen, R.W., 1964 “The Elastic Moduli of Fiber-Reinforced Materials”, J. of Appl. Mech., V. 31, pp. 223–234.Google Scholar
17. Carman, G.P., Cheung, K.S. and Wang, D.. “Micro-Mechanical Model of a Composite Containing a Conservative Nonlinear Electro-Magneto-Thermo-Mechanical Material”, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, V. 6, no. 5, Sept. 1995, pp. 691–700.Google Scholar
18. Moffett, M.B., Clark, A.E., Wun-Fogle, M., Linberg, J., Teter, J.P., McLaughlin, E.A.. 1991. “Characterization of Terfenol-D for Magnetostrictive Transducers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, pp. 1448–1455.Google Scholar