Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:19:02.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-situ annealing of self-ion irradiation damage in tungsten

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2014

Xiaoou. Yi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, U.K.
Michael L. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Trinity College, University of Oxford, Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BH, U.K.
Steve G. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, U.K.
Marquis A. Kirk
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

In our earlier work [1] microstructural evolution in tungsten under self-ion irradiation was investigated as a function of temperature and dose by in-situ 150 keV W+ ion irradiations on the IVEM-Tandem facility at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The present work focuses on the thermal stability of this damage. Thin foils of tungsten were irradiated at room temperature (R.T.) to fluences up to 1018 W+m-2 (∼ 1.0 dpa) and were then annealed in-situ for up to 120 min at temperatures between 300 and 800°C.

We found that: (1) loops with Burgers vectors ½ <111> and <100> coexist during annealing; (2) <100> is not a stable loop configuration above 300°C and the fraction of such loops decreased with increasing temperature and/or time; (3) changes in loop populations during annealing were very sensitive to temperature, but less sensitive to time. The majority of changes occurred within 15 min, and were associated with the loss of small (1-2 nm) dislocation loops. The origin of these trends is discussed by considering defect mobility and the energetics of defect configurations predicted by previous DFT calculations [2].

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Yi, X., PhD. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2013.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M.R., Dudarev, S.L., Derlet, P.M. and Pettifor, D.G., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 20, 345214 (2008).Google Scholar
Attardo, M. and Galligan, J.M., Phys. Stat. Sol. 16, 449 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowkett, K.M. and Ralph, B., Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 312, 5163 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeannotte, D. and Galligan, J.M., Acta Metallurgica. 18, 7179 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, L.K., Smith, J.P. and Moteff, J., Phys. Rev. 176(3), 851856 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykov, V.N., Birzhevoi, G.A., Zakharova, M.I., Solov’ev, V.A., Atomic Energy. 33(4), 930935 (1972) [Soviet Atomnaya Énergiya. 33 (4), 809-813 (1972)] CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, S.B., Radiation Effects. 5, 239243 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, M.L. and Kirk, M.A., Characterization of Radiation Damage by Transmission Electron Microscopy. (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 2001) p. 31, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokhodtseva, A., Décamps, B., Ramar, A. and Schäublin, R., Acta Materialia. 61(18), 69586971 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudarev, S.L., Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 43, 3561 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrer, H., Diffusion in Solids. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, 2007) p. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arakawa, K., Ono, K., Isshiki, M., Mimura, K., Uchikoshi, M. and Mori, H., Science. 318, 956959 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sand, A.E., Dudarev, S.L. and Nordlund, K., arXiv:1306.3824 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci].Google Scholar
Mason, D.R., Yi, X., Kirk, M.A. and Dudarev, S.L., arXiv:1402.0689 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci].Google Scholar
Jenkins, M.L., Yao, Z., Hernández-Mayoral, M., Kirk, M.A., J. Nucl. Mater. 389, 197202 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferroni, F., Yi, X., Edmondson, P. and Roberts, S.G. (private communication).Google Scholar