Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:35:33.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Grain Orientation on the Microstructural Characterization in Cu During (self)-Anneal using a Surface Acoustic wave Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Atsuko Sekiguchi ,
Kris Vanstreels ,
Steven DeMuynck ,
Jan D'Haen  and
Sywert H Brongersma
Atsuko Sekiguchi
Affiliation:
[email protected], Imec, SPDT/ITTO, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, N/A, N/A, Belgium
Kris Vanstreels
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMO/Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, N/A, 3590, Belgium
Steven DeMuynck
Affiliation:
[email protected], Imec, Leuven, N/A, 3001, Belgium
Jan D'Haen
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMO/Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, N/A, 3590, Belgium
Sywert H Brongersma
Affiliation:
[email protected], Imec, Leuven, N/A, 3001, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes the influence of microstructure, or more specifically grain orientation and grain size, on the in-line monitoring of copper interconnect properties during (self)-anneal using surface acoustic wave spectroscopy (SAWS). In electroplated Cu after (self)-anneal the SAWS frequency is lower for samples annealed at higher temperature because of the lower porosity induced elasticity. In sputtered Cu, the SAWS frequency shows a clear correlation with grain size, which is induced by a strong re-orientation of the copper film from the as-deposited (111) texture (E=190 GPa) to a strongly (100) textured super grain structure (E=78GPa).

Keywords

Cuacousticmicrostructure
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 914: Symposium F – Materials, Technology and Reliability of Low-k Dielectrics and Copper Interconnects , 2006 , 0914-F06-09
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Duggal, A.R., Rogers, J.A., Nelson, K.A., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 2823 (1992).Google Scholar
2 Dhar, L., Rogers, J.A., Nelson, K.A. and Trusell, F., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 4431 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Sekiguchi, A., presented at the 2006 MAM conference, Grenoble, France, 2006 (unpunlished).Google Scholar
4 Sanders, P.G., Eastman, J.A. and Weertman, J.R., Acta. Mater. 45, 4019 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Huang, H. and Spaepen, F., Acta Mater. 48, 3261 (2000).Google Scholar
6 Shen, T.D., Koch, C.C., Tsui, T.Y. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 10, 2892 (1995).Google Scholar
7 , Spriggs, J. Am. Ceram. 44, 70 (1961)Google Scholar
8 Hommel, M. and , Kraft, Acta. Mater. 49, 3935 (2001).Google Scholar
9 Uedono, A., Suzuki, T. and Nakamura, T., J. Appl. Phys. 98, 043504(2005).Google Scholar