Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:51:11.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporating Biodopants into PEDOT Conducting Polymers: Impact of Biodopant on polymer properties and biocompatibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2013

Paul J. Molino ,
Anthony Tibbens ,
Robert M.I. Kapsa  and
Gordon G. Wallace
Paul J. Molino
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Anthony Tibbens
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Robert M.I. Kapsa
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Gordon G. Wallace
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) was polymerized with the biological dopants dextran sulphate and chondroitin sulphate. Polymer physical and mechanical properties were investigated using quartz crystal microgravimetry with dissipation monitoring and atomic force microscopy, revealing polymer shear modulus and interfacial roughness to be significantly altered as a function of the dopant species. The adsorption of fibronectin, an important extracellular protein that is critical for a range of cellular functions and processes, was investigated using QCM-D, revealing protein adsorption to be increased on the DS doped PEDOT film relative to the CS doped film. PEDOT films have traditionally been doped with synthetic counterions such as polystyrene sulphonate (PSS), however the incorporation of biological molecules as the counterion, which has been shown to improve polymer biofunctionality, has received far less attention. In particular, there has been little detailed study on the impact of incorporating polyelectrolyte biomolecules into the PEDOT polymer matrix on fundamental polymer properties which are critical for biomedical applications. This investigation provides a detailed characterization of the interfacial and mechanical properties of biologically doped PEDOT films, as well as the efficacy of the composite films to bind and retain extracellular proteins of the type that are critical to the biocompatibility of the polymeric material.

Keywords

biomaterialelectrochemical synthesisdopant
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1569: Symposium QQ – Advanced Materials for Biological and Biomedical Applications , 2013 , pp. 225 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Richardson, R.T, Thompson, B., Moulton, S., Newbold, C., Lum, M.G and Cameron, A., Biomat. 28(3), 513 – 523 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, C.E, Shastri, V.R, Vacanti, J.P., R and Langer, R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94(17), 8948 – 8953 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelmi, A., Higgins, M.J. and Wallace, G.G., Biomat. 31, 1974 – 1983 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C.A., Clegg, R.E., Leavesley, D.I. and Pearcy, M.J., Tissue Engineering 11, 1–18 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engler, A.J., Griffin, M.A., Sen, S., Bonnemann, C.G., Sweeney, H.L. and Discher, D.E.. J. Cell Biol. 166(6), 877–887 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, T., Rehfeldt, F., Sweeney, H.L. and Discher, D.E.. Methods Mol. Biol. 621, 185–202 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar