Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:51:24.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hysteresis modeling of porous SMA for drug delivery system designed and fabricated by the laser-assisted sintering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2013

Igor V. Shishkovsky*
Affiliation:
P.N. Lebedev Physics Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Samara branch, Novo-Sadovaja st. 221, Samara 443011, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this report we develop a complete mathematical model for a porous scaffold from nitinol (NiTi – intermetallic phase) with a shape memory effect (SME), fabricated layerwise via the selective laser sintering (SLS) process. The operation of the SME bio-fluidic MEMS involves such physical process as a heat transfer, a phase transformation with a temperature hysteresis, stress-strain and electrical resistance variations accompanied the phase transformation. The simulations were conducted for the electro- and a thermo- mechanical hysteresis phenomenon, during the SME in the porous nitinol structures of the cylinder shape, which allow to formulate a recommendations for SLS. Previously done the temperature evolution of electrical resistivity was compared with our present calculations as a function of the laser-processing parameters for three dimensional nitinol samples. This model can be used for an estimation of a drug delivery system route during a porous phase volume changing.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hilt, J.Z., Peppas, N.A.. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 306, 15, (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shishkovsky, I.V.. MRS Proceedings, 1415, mrsf11-1415-ii03-10, (2012).Google Scholar
Shishkovsky, I., Sherbakoff, V. et al. . Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs., Part C, 226 (12), 2882, (2012).Google Scholar
Moore, J.L., McCuiston, A. et al. . Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 10 (4), 877, (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gultepe, E., Nagesha, D., Sridhar, S. et al. . Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 62, 305, (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheah, C.M., Leong, K.F., Chua, C.K. et al. . Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. Part H, 216, 369, (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liew, C.L., Leong, K.F., Chua, C.K., Du, Z.. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 18, 717, (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arutyunov, Y.I., Zhuravel, L.V. et al. . Physics of metals and metallography, 93(2), 185, (2002).Google Scholar
Dutta, S., Ghorbel, F.. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 10/2, 1, (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikuta, K., Tsukamoto, M., Hirose, S.. IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 103, (1991).Google Scholar
Antonucci, V., Faiella, G., Giordano, M. et al. . Thermochimica Acta, 462, 64, (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likhachev, A.. Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia, 32/4, 633, (1995).10.1016/0956-716X(95)90850-JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medvedev, A.E.. Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics, 6 (2),228, (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunter, V.E.. Delay law a new class of materials and implants in medicine. Northampton, MA: STT Publishing, 2000, 432 p.Google Scholar