Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:47:20.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth Rate of Solder Intermetallics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. D. Demaree*
Affiliation:
U. S. Army Research Laboratory — Materials Directorate, Metals Research Branch Watertown, MA 02172-0001
Get access

Abstract

The formation of intermetallic layers between copper wires and lead-tin solders is indicative of the strong metallurgical bond required for a durable solder joint Previous studies have shown that these interracial compounds grow at significant rates (up to 1 µm/day at 100°C), and differences in thermal expansion and hardness between the metals and the intermetallics can lead to the mechanical failure of the solder joint during service. Most previous measurements of the compound formation rate have used elevated temperatures to facilitate the direct observation of the intermetallic thickness by optical microscopy, SEM, or TEM. In this study, Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) has been used to study the intermetallic growth rate using sputter-deposited thin films of Cu and PbSn. The extraordinary depth sensitivity of RBS (~10 nm) allows these measurements to be made in relatively short times, without the need for heat treatment to accelerate the reaction. Measurements have indicated that at least 23 nm of Cu6Sn5 and 30 nm of Cu3Sn form between Cu and PbSn solder in less than one hour. Faster deposition methods are being investigated to further characterize this rapid reaction. Iron has been proposed as a diffusion barrier material to inhibit intermetallic growth in solder joints. Preliminary measurements of the solder/Fe reaction indicates a much slower rate of growth, with less than 50 nm of total intermetallic forming over 8 hours.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Romig, A. D., Chang, Y. A., Stephens, J. J., Frear, D. R., Marcotte, V. and Lea, C., in Solder Mechanics: A State of the Art Assessment, edited by Frear, D. R., Jones, W. B. and Kinsman, K.R. (TMS-AIME, Warrcndale, PA, 1991), p. 29104.Google Scholar
2 The Metal Science of Joining, edited by Cieslak, M. J., Gupta, D., Glicksman, M. J. and Perepezko, J. H. (TMS-AIME, Warrcndale, PA, 1992).Google Scholar
3 Fields, R. J., Low, S. R. III and Lucey, G. K. Jr., ibidGoogle Scholar
4 Unsworth, D. A. and MacKay, C. A., Trans. Inst. of Metal Finishing, 51, 85 (1973).Google Scholar
5 Kirchner, K. W., Lucey, G. K. and Geis, J., Microscopy Research and Technique, 25, 503508 (1993).Google Scholar
6 Mei, Z., Sunwoo, A. and Morris, J. W. Jr., Met. Trans. A, 23 (3), 857 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Doolittle, L. R., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 15, 227 (1986).Google Scholar