Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:27:04.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth of high quality Ge epitaxial layer on Si(100) substrate using ultra thin Si0.5Ge0.5 buffer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Junko Nakatsuru
Affiliation:
[email protected], Canon ANELVA Corporation, Process Technology, 5-8-1,, Yotsuya, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-8508, Japan, +81 42 334 0269, +81 42 335 2203
Hiroki Date
Affiliation:
[email protected], Canon ANELVA Corporation, Japan
Supika Mashiro
Affiliation:
[email protected], Canon ANELVA Corporation, Japan
Manabu Ikemoto
Affiliation:
[email protected], Canon ANELVA Corporation, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Methods for forming Ge epitaxial layer on Si (100) substrate have been vigorously sought due to potential applications of such structure as a virtual substrate for III-V devices on Si. Various methods were proposed to realize low threading dislocation density and smooth surface. To date, such methods involve more than one of thick (micrometer order) SiGe buffer growth process, high temperature annealing steps and CMP process, which could compromise reliability and suitability for production.

In this study, we report feasibility of a thin (in the order of 10nm) SiGe buffer layer to realize pure Ge epitaxial layer with good crystalinity, low threading dislocation density, and smooth surface without high temperature annealing steps and CMP process.

As a result, we achieved shorter time for growth of practical thickness of crystalline Ge on Si (100) substrate, and also get the high quality Ge epitaxial layer which has low threading dislocation density with very smooth surface.

Ge epitaxial layer and underlying thin SixGe1−x buffer layer were grown on Si (100) substrate using a cold wall UHV-CVD system. Source gases of Si and Ge were Si2H6 and GeH4, respectively. No carrier gas was used for this process. SiGe buffer layer was grown on Si(100) substrate at 450 – 520˚C. Two-step growth process was employed to grow Ge epitaxial layer on the buffer layer. Ge seed layer was grown at a low temperature (350–400˚C), followed by Ge thick layer growth at a high temperature (550–650˚C). XRD, TEM, EPD, and AFM were used for characterization of Ge epitaxial layer.

Optimization of growth temperature and source gas flow rate ratio enabled to obtain an effective buffer layer thinner than 10nm. The thin buffer layer realizes process time shortening, which is within 10min, and the smooth surface is realized without crosshatch structure. The buffer thickness is 1/160 to 1/1000 than that of previously known methods using thick SiGe buffer layers. Thin SiGe buffer also enabled process time shortening for Ge seed layer growth as two-dimensional Ge layer was formed faster on the thin SiGe buffer layer than on Si. XRD of the Ge seed layer showed 97% relaxation as grown and fully relaxed at 550˚C. The threading dislocation density of the top Ge layer was estimated below 1E7counts/cm2 by TEM and EPD.

The misfit dislocations oriented along [110] at the interface between the SiGe buffer layer and the Ge layer and the distances are 9.5nm constantly in cross-sectional TEM image. We are checking the surface roughness of the Ge epitaxial layer by using AFM.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Colace, L., Masini, G and Chiao, H.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 (2000) 1231 Google Scholar
[2] Murakami, E., Etoh, H., Nakagawa, K. and Miyao, M.: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29 (1990) L1059 Google Scholar
[3] Curde, M.T. and Samavedam, S.B.: Appl. Phys. Lett 72 (1998) 1718 Google Scholar
[4] Liu, J. L. and Tong, S.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 19 (2001) 3431 Google Scholar
[5] Luo, G. and Yang, T.: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42 (2003) L517 Google Scholar
[6] Nakajima, K. and Juraya, K: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33 (1994) 1420 10.1143/JJAP.33.1420Google Scholar
[7] Nakajima, K.: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38 (1999) 1875 Google Scholar
[8] Murata, Takeshi and Suemitsu, Maki: J. Vac. Soc. Jpn. Vol. 48, No.l (2005) 23 10.3131/jvsj.48.23Google Scholar
[9] Sakai, Akira: Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 (2005) 221916 Google Scholar