Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:38:21.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Work Conducted on MgO Characterization and Hydration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Haoran Deng ,
Yongliang Xiong ,
Martin Nemer  and
Shelly Johnsen
Haoran Deng
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, United States
Yongliang Xiong
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, Carlsbad, New Mexico, United States
Martin Nemer
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, Carlsbad, New Mexico, United States
Shelly Johnsen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, Carlsbad, New Mexico, United States
Get access

Abstract

Magnesium oxide (MgO) is the only engineered barrier certified by the EPA for emplacement in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a U.S. Department of Energy repository for transuranic waste. MgO will reduce actinide solubilities by sequestering CO2 generated by the biodegradation of cellulosic, plastic, and rubber materials. Demonstration of the effectiveness of MgO is essential to meet the U.S Environmental Protection Agency's requirement for multiple natural and engineered barriers. In the past, a series of experiments was conducted at Sandia National Laboratories to verify the efficacy of Premier Chemicals LLC (Premier) MgO as a chemical-control agent in the WIPP. Since December 2004, Premier MgO is no longer available for emplacement in the WIPP. Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties LLC is the new MgO supplier. MgO characterization, including chemical, mineralogic, and reactivity analysis, has been performed to address uncertainties concerning the amount of reactive constituents in Martin Marietta MgO. Characterization results of Premier MgO will be reported for comparison. Particle size, solid-to-liquid ratio, and stir speed could affect the rate of carbonation of MgO slurries. Thus, it's reasonable to hypothesize that these factors will also affect the rate of hydration. Accelerated MgO hydration experiments were carried out at two or three levels for each of the above factors in deionized water at 70 °C. The Minitab statistical software package was used to design a fractional-factorial experimental matrix and analyze the test results. We also fitted the accelerated inundated hydration data to four different kinetic models and calculated the hydration rates. As a result of this study we have determined that different mechanisms may be important for different particle sizes, surface control for large particles and diffusion for small particles.

Keywords

chemical compositionMgkinetics
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1124: Symposium Q – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXII , 2008 , 1124-Q05-05
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. U.S. DOE, Title 40 CFR Part 191 Compliance Recertification Application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Appendix BARRIERS (DOE/WIPP 2004–3231), U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Area Office, Carlsbad, NM, (2004).Google Scholar
2. Fernandez, A.I., Chimenos, J.M., Segarra, M., Fernandez, M.A. and Espiell, F., Hydrometallurgy 53, 155–167 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Nemer, M.B., Memo to the records center, ERMS 542612, Sandia National Laboratories, Carlsbad, NM, 2006.Google Scholar
4. Deng, H., Xiong, Y., and Nemer, M.B., Report, ERMS 546570, Sandia National Laboratories, Carlsbad, NM, 2007.Google Scholar
5. Snider, A.C., and Xiong, Y., Analysis report, ERMS 537188, Sandia National Laboratories, Carlsbad, NM, 2004.Google Scholar
6. Fruhwirth, O., Herzog, G.W., Hollerer, I. and Rachetti, A., Surf. Technol. 24, 293–300 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Rocha, S.D., Mansur, M.B. and Ciminelli, V.S., J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 79, 816–821 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Layden, G.K., and Brindley, G. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 46, 518–522 (1963).Google Scholar
9. Raymond, R.J. and Brindley, G.W., Trans. Faraday Soc. 61, 1017–1025 (1964).Google Scholar
10. Carter, R.E., J. Chem. Phys. 34, 2010–2015 (1961).Google Scholar