Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:13:34.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental adsorption studies on different materials selected for developing a permeable reactive barrier for radiocesium retention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2014

Miguel García-Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
CIEMAT, Departamento de Medioambiente, Av. Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid (SPAIN).
Tiziana Missana
Affiliation:
CIEMAT, Departamento de Medioambiente, Av. Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid (SPAIN).
Ana Benedicto
Affiliation:
CIEMAT, Departamento de Medioambiente, Av. Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid (SPAIN).
Carlos Ayora
Affiliation:
IDAEA-CSIC, Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona (SPAIN)
Katrien DePourcq
Affiliation:
IDAEA-CSIC, Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona (SPAIN)
Get access

Abstract

Cs-137 was accidentally spilled in an industrial waste repository located in a salt marsh in southern Spain, and a permeable reactive barrier was proposed to retain it. Cs adsorption properties of different natural clayey materials were analyzed. The salt marsh waters show high salinity and high chemical variability, therefore Cs adsorption was also analyzed in the presence of competitive ions, especially K+ and NH4+.

Cs adsorption was non-linear in all the analyzed materials, indicating more than one adsorption sites with different selectivity. It was shown that in mixed clay systems with illite, montmorillonite and kaolinite, the presence of illite favors Cs retention at low and medium Cs loadings and montmorillonite at high Cs loadings. In the presence of illite and montmorillonite, kaolinite plays almost no role in Cs retention. The presence of K+ and NH4+ significantly hinders cesium adsorption.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borai, E.H, Hariula, R., Malinen, L., Paajanen, A. (2009), Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172(1), 416422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Y., Shin, W.S., Choi, S. (2012), Journal of Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 292, 837852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumhans, J.L, Brady, P.V., Anderson, H.L. (2001). J. Contaminant Hydrology, 233240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberl, D.D. (1980), Clay and Clay Minerals, 28(3), 161172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawhney, B.L. (1972), Clays and Clay Minerals, 20, 93100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Missana, T., García-Gutiérrez, M., Benedicto, A., Ayora, C., De-Pourcq, K. (2013), Applied Geochemistry, to be submitted.Google Scholar