Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T03:25:32.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution of Interfacial Roughness Correlations of Fe Au Films Grown on Mgo(001) Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

P. C. Chow ,
R. Paniago ,
R. Forrest ,
S. C. Moss ,
S. S. P. Parkin  and
D. Cookson
P. C. Chow
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5506
R. Paniago
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5506
R. Forrest
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5506
S. C. Moss
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5506
S. S. P. Parkin
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099
D. Cookson
Affiliation:
ANSTO, Private Mail Bag 1, Menai 2234, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The growth by sputtering of a series of thin films of Fe/Au on MgO(001) substrates was analyzed using Bragg and diffuse X-ray scattering. The Fe (bcc) layer grows rotated by 45° with respect to the MgO – Au(fcc) (001) epitaxial orientation, resulting in an almost perfect match between the two metallic structures. By collecting the X-ray diffuse scattering under grazing incidence using a 2-dimensional image plate detector, we mapped the reciprocal space of these films. We characterized the correlated interface roughness starting with a buffer of Fe in which only three interfaces are present. The propagation of the roughness was subsequently characterized for Fe/Au multilayers with 40 and 100 bilayers. We observe an enlargement of the surface features as a function of time, evidenced by the longer lateral cutoff length measured for thicker films.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 440: Symposia CA – Structure and Evolution of Surfaces , 1996 , 359
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Parkin, S. S. P., Phys. Rev. Lett 71, 1641 (1993).Google Scholar
2. For a review, see Barabási, A.-L. and Stanley, H. E., Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar
3. Kardar, M., Physica B 221, 60 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Salditt, T., Metzger, T. H. and Peisl, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2228 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Paniago, R., Homma, H., Chow, P. C., Moss, S. C., Barnea, Z., Parkin, S. S. P. and Cookson, D., Phys. Rev. B 52, R 17052 (1995).Google Scholar
6. See, e.g., Begley, A. M., Kim, S. K., Quinn, J. and Jona, F., Phys. Rev. B 48, 1779 (1993) and B. T. Jonker and G. Prinz, Surf Sci. 172, L568 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Holý, V. and Baumbach, T., Phys. Rev. B 49, 10668 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Dietrich, S. and Haase, A., Phys. Rep. 260 1 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Sinha, S. K., Sirota, E. B., Garoff, S. and Stanley, H. B., Phys. Rev. B 38, 2297 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Palasantzas, G. and Krim, J., Phys. Rev. B 48, 2873, (1993).Google Scholar
11. Kardar, M., Parisi, G. and Zhang, Y.-C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986).Google Scholar