Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:02:42.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrochemical Study of 1018 Steel Exposed to Different Soils from South of México

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2015

L. M. Quej-Ake  and
A. Contreras
L. M. Quej-Ake*
Affiliation:
Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Eje Central Lázaro Cárdenas Norte No.152, Col. San Bartolo Atepehuacan, Del. Gustavo A. Madero, C.P. 07730, México
A. Contreras
Affiliation:
Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Eje Central Lázaro Cárdenas Norte No.152, Col. San Bartolo Atepehuacan, Del. Gustavo A. Madero, C.P. 07730, México
*
* E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Physicochemical effect on the corrosion process of AISI 1018 steel exposed to five type of soils from South of México at different moisture content using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and potentiodynamic polarization curves was studied. Two soils were collected in the state of Veracruz (clay of high plasticity and silt) and three soils from the state of Campeche (sand, clay and clay-silt). Moisture values were determined by addition of 0, 20, 40 and 60 ml of deionized water in a volume of 125 cm3 of each soil. The corrosion behavior of uncoated and coated steel with a viscoelastic polymer was analyzed. Effect of damage on the coating when the steel is exposed to corrosive soils was studied. EIS evaluations indicate that 1018 steel without coating is more susceptible to corrosion in the clay at the maximum moisture content (39.7 wt. %). However, for sand the more corrosive moisture belong to 12.8 wt. %, which is not the maximum moisture, which is agree with the lower polarization resistance (52.21 Ω.cm2). Potentiodynamic polarization curves suggested that uncoated steel exposed to clay-silt from state of Campeche exhibited the higher corrosion rate (0.698 mm/year) at 53.1 wt. % moisture. Meanwhile, in the coated steel with induced damage, the higher corrosion rate was obtained in the clay (0.0018 mm/year) at 34.2 wt. % moisture. 1018 steel coated with induced damage exposed to clay displayed the higher Ecorr values, which means that clay is more susceptible to overprotection as consequence of any change in the voltages originated by moisture content.

Keywords

Steeldefectscorrosioncoatingionic conductor
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1766: Symposium 5B – Structural and Chemical Characterization of Metals, Alloys, and Compounds—2014 , 2015 , pp. 81 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Quej-Ake, L.M., Galván Martínez, R., Contreras, A., Materials Science Forum, 755, 153 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haruna, T., Shibata, T., Toyota, R., Corrosion Science, 39, 1935 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contreras, A., Hernández, S.L., Orozco Cruz, R., Galván Martínez, R., Materials and Design, 35, 281 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alamilla, J.L., Espinosa Medina, M.A., Sosa, E., Corrosion Science, 51, 2628 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, S.A., Practical Handbook of corrosion control in soils, Third printing, Canada, Casti, (2001).Google Scholar
Benmoussat, A., Hadjel, M., The Journal of Corrosion Science and Engineering, 7, 1 (2005).Google Scholar
Espinosa Medina, M.A., Sosa, E., Angeles Chavez, C., Contreras, A., Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, 46, 32 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quej, L., Cabrera, R., Arce, E., Marin, J., International Journal Electrochemical Science, 8, 924 (2013).Google Scholar
González, G., Cortez, V.J., Ramírez, J.G., Revista Mexicana de Física, 50, 60 (2004).Google Scholar
Nie, X.H., Li, X.G., Du, C.W., Cheng, Y.F., J. Applied Electrochemistry, 39, 277 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervasio, D., Song, I., Payer, J.H., J. Applied Electrochemistry, 28, 979 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J.N., Moran, P.J., Corrosion, 45, 885 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, J.H., Materials Performance, 49, 17 (1993).Google Scholar
Velázquez, Z., Guzman, E., Espinosa, M.A., Contreras, A., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 1242, 69 (2010).Google Scholar
Contreras, A., Hernández, S.L., Galvan, R., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 1275, 43 (2011).Google Scholar
ASTM D-4959, Standard test method for determination of water (moisture) content of soil by directs heating, (2007).Google Scholar
ASTM G-200, Standard test method for measurement of oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) of soil, (2014).Google Scholar
Boukamp, B.A., Users Manual Equivalent Circuit, Version 4.51, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Twente, Netherlands (1993).Google Scholar
Stansbury, E.E., Buchanan, R.A.: Fundamentals of Electrochemical Corrosion, United States of America: ASM International, first Edition, (2000).Google Scholar
Marcus, P., Oudar, J., Corrosion Mechanisms in Theory and Practice, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., First Ed., (1995).Google Scholar
Pech Canul, M.A., Chi Canul, L.P., Corrosion, 55, 948 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, J.R., Impedance Spectroscopy, United States of America, John Wiley and Sons, First edition (1987).Google Scholar
Yan, M., Wang, J., Han, E., Ke, W., Corrosion Science, 50, 1331 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bi, H., Sykes, J., Corrosion Science, 53, 3416 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar