Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:45:44.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Characterization of Defects Introduced in 4H-SiC During High Energy Proton Irradiation and Their Annealing Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

M. Ahoujja
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, USA
H. C. Crocket
Affiliation:
Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA
M. B. Scott
Affiliation:
Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA
Y.K. Yeo
Affiliation:
Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA
R. L. Hengehold
Affiliation:
Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA
Get access

Abstract

We report on the electrical properties of defects introduced in epitaxial 4H-SiC by 2 MeV protons using deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS). After proton irradiation with a dose of about 1.5×1014 cm-2, the DLTS measurements were made, and the rate window shows a single broad peak between 280 and 310 K. The intensity of this peak remains unchanged after a thermal anneal at 900°C for 20 min. However, after annealing at or above 1100°C, the peak intensity gradually decreases with anneal temperature up to 1500°C, indicating a decrease in the defect concentration. Because a complete damage recovery of the SiC is not observed even after annealing at 1500°C, we believe a higher temperature annealing is necessary for a complete recovery. Using a curve fit analysis, a set of deep levels of defect centers were found with energy ranging between 567 and 732 meV. These traps do not exhibit a significant change in the trap energy or capture cross-section parameters as a function of anneal temperature, but the decrease in the trap density with increasing anneal temperature demonstrates a damage recovery.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Palmour, W., et al., in Proc. Of 28th Intersociety Energy Conv. Engr. Conf., American Chemical Society, pp. 1.2491.254 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Bardeleben, H. J. von, Cantin, J. L., Vickridge, I., and Battistig, G., Phys. Rev. B 62, 10126 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Lindstrom, G., Moll, M., and Fretwurst, E., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 426, 1 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Hacke, P., Nakayama, H., Detchprohm, T., Hiramatsu, K., and Sawaki, N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1362 (1996)Google Scholar
5. Evwaraye, A. O., Smith, S. R., and Mitchel, W. C., J. of Appl. Phys. 79, 7726 (1996)Google Scholar
6. Schroder, D. K, Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization, 2nd Ed., New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (1998) p. 290 Google Scholar
7. Lebedev, A. A., Veinger, A. I., Davydov, D. V., Kozlovskii, V. V., Savkina, N. S., and Strel'chuk, A. M., Semiconductors 34, 1016 (2000).Google Scholar