Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:00:21.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elastic Modulus and Mineral Density of Dentine and Enamel in Natural Caries Lesions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Amanpreet K. Bembey ,
Michelle L. Oyen ,
Ching-Chang Ko ,
Andrew J. Bushby  and
Alan Boyde
Amanpreet K. Bembey
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
Michelle L. Oyen
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Ching-Chang Ko
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Andrew J. Bushby
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
Alan Boyde
Affiliation:
Dental Institute, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 1BB, UK
Get access

Abstract

Dental tissues have been reported to show a considerable decrease in both their mineral content and mechanical properties in carious lesions. The changed properties of dentine and enamel have been shown to be dependent on crystal size and not only mineral content [1], although the connectivity between the mineral crystals has been overlooked. Teeth with carious lesions were sectioned, embedded in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and diamond polished. Nanoindentation and quantitative backscattered electron imaging were used to determine relationships between the elastic modulus and mineral density of sound and carious regions within dentine and enamel. The changes in elastic modulus with decreased mineralization for dentine and enamel could not be explained by simple composite mechanics expressions relating elastic modulus and mineral volume fraction. Finite element modeling of dentine and enamel as a two-phase composite material at the ultrastructure level were used to demonstrate how changes in the mineral phase connectivity can produce changes in the elastic modulus. Tissue models for enamel, in which the mineral phase is both the major component of the structure (∼ 85% by volume) and highly interconnected, were consistent with the modulus of sound enamel. The drastic change in enamel modulus with a relatively small change in mineral volume fraction could be modeled as a decrease in mineral phase connectivity at nearly constant volume fraction. The more gradual trend in the dentine data was also consistent with a structure that is initially highly connected in the mineral phase, consistent with the known structure of dentine, and for which the change in modulus is more directly related to changes in mineral content than mineral connectivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 874: Symposium l – Structure and Mechanical Behavior of Biological Materials , 2005 , L5.15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Angker, L., Nocklands, C., Swain, M.V. and Kilpatrick, N., Arch. Oral. Bio. 49, 369–378 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Katz, J.L.. J Biomech. 4, 455 (1971).Google Scholar
3. Kinney, J.H., Balooch, M., Marshall, S.J., Marshall, G.W., Weihs, T.P.. Arch Oral Biol 41, 9 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Hellmich, C. and Ulm, F-J., J Biomech 35, 1199 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Oyen, M.L. and Ko, C-C., MRS Proceedings, 844, Y8.7 (2005).Google Scholar
6. Banerjee, A. and Boyde, A., Caries Research. 32, 219 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Banerjee, A. and Boyde, A., Scanning 19, 151 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Ferguson, V.L., Bushby, A.J., and Boyde, A., MRS Proceedings, 841, 3–8, (2005).Google Scholar
9. Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V., J. Mater. Res. 8, 297 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Bushby, A.J., Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 17, 213 (2001).Google Scholar
11. Bushby, A.J., Ferguson, V.L. and Boyde, A. J. Mater. Res. 19, 249 (2004).Google Scholar
12. Ferguson, V.L., Bushby, A.J. and Boyde, A. J. Anat. 203, 191 (2003).Google Scholar
13. Bembey, A.K., Koonjul, V., Bushby, A.J., Ferguson, V.L. and Boyde, A., MRS Proceedings, 841, 9–14, 2005.Google Scholar
14. Wegner, L.D. and Gibson, L.J., Intl J of Mechanical Sciences 42, 925 (2000).Google Scholar
15. Boyde, A., J Dent Res. 58 special issue B:981 (1979).Google Scholar