Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:03:38.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Defect Modification and Reduction Techniques on the Radiation Sensitivity of Optical Fibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

T. Wei
Affiliation:
GTE Laboratories Incorporated, 40 Sylvan Road, Waltham, MA 02254
M. P. Singh
Affiliation:
GTE Laboratories Incorporated, 40 Sylvan Road, Waltham, MA 02254
W. J. Miniscalco
Affiliation:
GTE Laboratories Incorporated, 40 Sylvan Road, Waltham, MA 02254
J. A. Wall
Affiliation:
Rome Air Development Center/ESRE, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated the relationship of precursor defects in as-drawn optical fiber to glass composition and processing conditions in order to understand the radiation sensitivity of doped-core optical fiber. Techniques are reported for improving the radiation hardness of graded-index multimode fibers through reducing the concentration of doping- and processing-induced defects as well as modifying the residual defects in as-drawn fiber. Significant decreases in radiation-induced loss have been observed for fibers pretreated with hydrogen. An investigation of the role of drawing-induced defects indicates that a lower draw temperature produces slightly harder fiber. A study of core/clad interfacial stress revealed that such stress does not play a major role in radiation sensitivity.

Measurement techniques included in situ loss measurements at 850 nm and spectral loss measurements before and after -γ irradiation. In addition, photoluminescence proved to be an effective tool for characterizing specific defect centers. It was found for Ge/P-codoped fibers that the luminescence band at 650 nm attributed to drawing/radiation induced centers has an inverse correlation with induced loss. Previously unreported emission bands have been observed, including one at 720 nm which may be related to fluorine doping.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. For a review see Friebele, E. J., Long, K. J., Askings, C. G., Gingerich, M. E., Marrone, M. J., and Griscom, D. L., SPIE 541, 70 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Friebele, E. J., Schultz, P. C., and Gingerich, M. E., Appl. Opt. 19, 2910 (1980)Google Scholar
3. Gozen, T., Tanaka, H., Utsumi, A., Maeda, T., and Okamoto, S., Proc. 1984 Conf. on Elect. Insul. and Phenomena, Dielect., (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1984), p.65 Google Scholar
4. Shibata, S. and Nakahara, M., J. Lightwave Technol. LT 3, 860 (1985)Google Scholar
5. Hanafusa, H., Hibino, Y., and Yamamoto, F., Elect. Lett. 22, 106 (1986)Google Scholar
6. Tomita, A. and Lemaire, P. J., Elect. Lett. 21, 71 (1985)Google Scholar
7. Wei, T., Singh, M. P., Miniscalco, W. J., and Wall, J. A., SPIE 721, in press.Google Scholar
8. Skuja, L. N., Silin, A. R., and Boganov, A. G., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 63, 431 (1984)Google Scholar
9. Friebele, E. J., Griscom, D. L., and Marrone, M. J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 71, 133 (1985)Google Scholar
10. Onorato, P. I. K. (private communications).Google Scholar