Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T02:25:00.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Ru on Unsupported Pt-Ru Alloys for Methanol Electro-Oxidation at Different Temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Deryn Chu ,
Charles Walker  and
Sol Gilman
Deryn Chu
Affiliation:
Electronics and Power Sources Directorate Army Research Laboratory, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703-5601
Charles Walker
Affiliation:
Electronics and Power Sources Directorate Army Research Laboratory, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703-5601
Sol Gilman
Affiliation:
Electronics and Power Sources Directorate Army Research Laboratory, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703-5601
Get access

Abstract

Unsupported different atomic ratios of platinum-ruthenium bulk alloys were prepared. The alloys were characterized by cyclic voltammetry, X-ray diffraction and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. These alloys were also tested as anodes for methanol electro-oxidation in sulfuric acid over a range of temperatures. Ruthenium is inactive for methanol electro-oxidation at 25 °C, but becomes active at higher temperatures. When a comparison is made on the basis of “true” (hydrogen adsorption) surface area, a 30 atomic percent Ru electrocatalyst provides the highest activity for methanol electro-oxidation as measured at either 0.4 or 0.5V vs. RHE at both 25 and 60 °C.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 393: Symposium W – Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage and Conversion , 1995 , 25
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Parsons, R. and VanderNoot, T., J. Electroanal. Chem., 257, 9 (1988) and references therein.Google Scholar
2 Surampudi, S., Narayanan, S. R., Vamos, E., Frank, H. F., Halpert, G., LaConti, A., Kosek, J., Surya, G. K., Olah, G. A., J. Power Sources, 47, 377 (1994).Google Scholar
3 Entina, V. S. and Petry, O. A., Electrokhimiya, 4, 111 (1968).Google Scholar
4 Binder, H., Kohling, A. and Sandstede, G., In From Electrocatalysis To Fuel Cells, Sandstede, G., Editor, University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA (1972). pp. 43–58.Google Scholar
5 Watanabe, M., Uchida, M. and Motoo, S., J. Electroanal. Chem., 229, 395 (1987).Google Scholar
6 Goodenough, J. and Manoharan, R., Chem. Mater, 1, 391 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Gasteiger, H. A., Markovic, N., Ross, P. N., Jr., and J Cairns, E., J. Phys. Chem. 97, 12020 (1993); J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.141, No. 7, 1795 (1994).Google Scholar
8 Chu, D., Annual Report to National Research Council, Washington D.C. 1993.Google Scholar
9 Bagotzky, V. S. and Vassilyev, T. B., Electrochim. Acta., 12, 1323 (1967).Google Scholar
10 Aramata, A., kodera, T. and Masuda, M., J. of Applied Electrochem. 18, 577 (1988).Google Scholar