Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T09:57:32.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Processing Parameters on the Growth Rate and Microstructure of Al2O3/Metal Matrix Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Alan S. Nagelberg
Alan S. Nagelberg*
Affiliation:
Lanxide Corporation, 1 Tralee Industrial Park, Newark, DE 19714-6077
Get access

Abstract

Ceramic matrix composites can be formed by the directed oxidation of a doped molten aluminum alloy into an inert reinforcement or filler. The resultant ceramic matrix consists of interconnected Al2O3 and partially interconnected metal. The growth kinetics of this Al2O3 /metal ceramic matrix can be altered by numerous parameters. The effect of the growth atmosphere composition and temperature on the composite growth rate is dependent on the alloy dopant utilized. The ceramic matrix formation rate is also dependent on the alloy composition. Likewise, alloy composition has a profound effect on the mechanical properties and microstructure of the composites produced.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 155: Symposium L – Processing Science of Advanced Ceramics , 1989 , 275
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Newkirk, M. S., Urquhart, A. W., Zwicker, H. R., and Breval, E., J. Mater. Res. 1(1), 81 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Newkirk, M. S., Lesher, H. D., White, D. R., Kennedy, C. R., Urquhart, A. W., and Claar, T. D., Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, 8(7–8), p. 879 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Aghajanian, M. K., Macmillan, N. H., Kennedy, C. R., Luszcz, S. J., Roy, R., J. Mater. Sci., 24, 658, (1989).Google Scholar
4. Antolin, S., Nagelberg, A. S., and Creber, D., J. Am. Cer. Soc. (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
5. Nagelberg, A. S., Solid State Ionics, 32/33, 783 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Breval, E. and Nagelberg, A. S., Multicomponent Ultrafine Microstructures, ed. Candish, L. E., Kear, B. H., and Siegel, R. W., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., Vol.132, (1989).Google Scholar
7. Nagelberg, A. S., Antolin, S., and Urquhart, A. W., J. Am. Cer. Soc. (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
8. Nagelberg, A. S., presented at the 1988 Am. Cer. Soc. Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, May 1988, paper 107-C-88 (unpublished).Google Scholar
9. Antolin, S. and Aghajanian, M. K., presented at the 1988 Am. Cer. Soc. Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, OH, May 1988, paper 109-C-88 (unpublished).Google Scholar
10. Andersson, C. A. and Aghajanian, M. K., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 9(7–8), 621 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Nagelberg, A. S., presented at the 1988 Am. Cer. Soc. Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, OH, May 1988, paper 108-C-88, (unpublished).Google Scholar