Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T05:27:12.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Forging Temperature on Microstructure and Tensile Properties in Fe3Al-Based Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Y. Yang ,
W. Yan ,
J. N. Liu  and
S. Hanada
Y. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Xi’an Institute of Technology, Xi’an, China
W. Yan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Xi’an Institute of Technology, Xi’an, China
J. N. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Xi’an Institute of Technology, Xi’an, China
S. Hanada
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Forging processes at two different temperatures are performed to examine the relation between the microstructure and room temperature tensile properties in a Ce doped Fe3Al-based alloy. Results show that the microstructure and the ductility are sensitive to the forging temperature before annealing treatment. Higher yield strength and ductility can be obtained through forging at a relatively low temperature of 750°C followed by annealing at 800°C and 500°C. It is suggested that the formation of non-equilibrium grain boundaries and banded subgrains within carbide-free areas along grain boundaries enhances the local plastic deformation and results in the improvement of ductility. During the initial deformation at room temperature <111> slip is predominant for both microstructures.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 364: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys–VI , 1994 , 121
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Liu, C.T., Lee, E.H., Mckamey, C.G., Scripta Met. 23, 875 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Liu, C.T., Mckamey, C.G., Lee, E.H., Scripta Met. 24, 385 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Mckamey, C.G., Horton, J.A., Liu, C.T., J. Mater. Res. 4, 1156 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Mckamey, C.G. and Liu, C.T, Scripta Met. 24, 2119 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Mckamey, C.G., Maziasz, P.J., Goodwin, G.M., Zacharia, T., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 174, 59 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Yan, W., Liu, J.N., Yang, Y., Final Report for Contracted Research, 1993.Google Scholar
7. Sikka, V.K., Viswanathan, S., Mckamey, C.G., in Structural Intermetallics, edited by Darolia, R., Lewandowski, J.J., Liu, C.T., Martin, P.L., Miracle, D.B. and Nathal, M.V. (TMS Proc. 1993) pp. 483–491.Google Scholar
8. Morris, D.G. and Leboeuf, M., Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 1817 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Nazarov, A.A., Phil. Mag. A, 69, 327 (1994).Google Scholar