Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T09:45:48.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dopant-Defect Interactions in II-VI Semiconductors Studied by PAC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Thomas Wichert
Thomas Wichert*
Affiliation:
Technische Physik, Universität des Saarlandes, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The application of the perturbed γγ angular correlation technique (PAC) as an analytical tool for the characterisation of atomic defect configurations is discussed, using recent results on donor-acceptor pairs, which were observed in CdTe and other II-VI semiconductors by the radioactive donor 111In. For bulk CdTe crystals and MOCVD grown CdTe films, the role of the cation vacancy, group I and group V elements is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 378: Symposium B – Defect and Impurity-Engineered Semiconductors and Devices , 1995 , 237
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Stradling, R.A. and Klipstein, P.C. (eds): Growth and Characterisation of Semiconductors, (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1990).Google Scholar
2) Feldman, L.C. and Mayer, J. W. (eds.): Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, (North-Holland, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
3) Langouche, G. (ed.): Hyperfine Interactions of Defects in Semiconductors (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992).Google Scholar
4) Broser, I. and Franke, K.H., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26, 1013 (1965); I. Broser and M. Schulz, Z. Physik 254, 35 (1972).Google Scholar
5) Petersen, J.W. and Nielsen, J., Mat. Sci. Forum 83–87, 1103 (1992).Google Scholar
6) Lang, M., Pensl, G., Gebhard, M., Achtziger, N. and Uhrmacher, M., Mat. Sci. Forum 83–87, 1097 (1992).Google Scholar
7) Gwilliam, R., Sealy, B.J. and Vianden, R., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B63, 106 (1992).Google Scholar
8) Magerle, R., Kerle, T., Burchard, A., Deicher, M., Pfeiffer, W., to be published.Google Scholar
9) Wichert, Th., Achtziger, N., Metzner, H. and Sielemann, R.in ref. 3, p. 77.Google Scholar
10) Wichert, Th., Krings, Th. and Wolf, H., Physica B 185, 297 (1993), and references therein.Google Scholar
11) Deicher, M., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B63, 189 (1992).Google Scholar
12) Wolf, H., Krings, Th., Ott, U., Hornauer, U. and Wichert, Th., Mater. Sci. Forum 83–87, 1259 (1992).Google Scholar
13) Wolf, H., Hornauer, U., Lermen, R., Endalamaw, Y., Filz, T., Krings, Th., Lauer, St., Ott, U., Singer, E., Tsige, M. and Wichert, Th., Mat. Sci. Forum 143–147, 391 (1994).Google Scholar
14) Kalish, R., Deicher, M. and Schatz, G., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 4793 (1982).Google Scholar
15) Wegner, D. and Meyer, E.A., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1, 5403 (1989).Google Scholar
16) Griffith, J.W., Lundquist, R., Platzer, R., Gardner, J.A., Karczewski, G. and Furdyna, J., Mat. Sci. Forum 143–147, 405 (1994).Google Scholar
17) Wolf, H., Burchard, A., Deicher, M., Filz, T., Jost, A., Magerle, R., Ostheimer, V., Pfeiffer, W. and Wichert, Th., in 18th Int. Conf on Defects in Semiconductors, Sendai, Japan, 1995.Google Scholar
18) Thomas, D.G. (ed.), II-VI Semiconducting Compounds (Benjamin, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
19) Schneider, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 46, 13 (1985).Google Scholar
20) Hofmann, DM., Omling, P., Grimmeiss, H.G., Meyer, B.K., Benz, K.W. and Sinerius, D., Phys. Rev. B 45, 6247 (1992).Google Scholar
21) Gély-Sykes, C., Corbel, C. and Triboulet, R., Solid State Commun. 80, 79 (1991).Google Scholar
22) Wolf, H., Krings, Th., Hautojärvi, P., Hornauer, U., Lermen, R., Liszkay, L., Filz, T., Lauer, St., Ott, U., Singer, E. and Wichert, Th, to be published.Google Scholar
23) Henry, C.H., Nassau, K. and Shiever, J.W., Phys. Rev. B 4, 2453 (1971).Google Scholar
24) Wolf, H., Krings, Th. and Wichert, Th., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B63, 240 (1993).Google Scholar
25) Zielinska, R., Król, A. and Nazarewicz, W., J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 17, 5209 (1984).Google Scholar
26) Kukimoto, H., Mat. Sci. Forum 143–147, 385 (1994).Google Scholar
27) Rüb, M., Achtziger, N., Meier, J., Reislöhner, U., Rudolph, P., Wienecke, M. and Witthuhn, W., J. Cryst. Growth 138, 285 (1994).Google Scholar
28) Edwall, D.D., Bubulac, L.O. and Gertner, E.R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10, 1423 (1992); J.M. Arias, J.G. Pasko, M. Zandian, S.H. Shin, G.M. Williams, L.O. Bubulac, R.E. DeWames and W.E. Tennant, to be published.Google Scholar
29) Filz, T., Hamann, J., Müller, R., Ostheimer, V., Wolf, H. and Wichert, Th., in 7th Int. Conf on II-VI Compounds and Devices, Edinburgh, Schottland, 1995.Google Scholar
30) Wolf, H., Filz, T., Lauer, St., Jost, A., Ostheimer, V., Wichert, Th., Deicher, M., Magerle, R., Burchard, A., Forkel-Wirth, D. and Haas, H., in 10in Int. Conf. on Hyperfine Interactions, Leuven, Belgium, 1995.Google Scholar