Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:09:27.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design of Architectured Sandwich Core Materials using Topological Optimization Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Laurent Laszczyk
Affiliation:
[email protected], Grenoble INP, CNRS, UJF, SIMAP, SAINT-MARTIN-D'HERES, France
Rémy Dendievel
Affiliation:
[email protected], Grenoble INP, CNRS, UJF, SIMAP, SAINT-MARTIN-D'HERES, France
Olivier Bouaziz
Affiliation:
[email protected], ArcelorMittal Research, MAIZIERES-LES-METZ, France
Yves Bréchet
Affiliation:
[email protected], United States
Guillaume Parry
Affiliation:
[email protected], Grenoble INP, CNRS, UJF, SIMAP, SAINT-MARTIN-D'HERES, France
Get access

Abstract

Sandwich structures are especially interesting when multiple functionalities (such as stiffness and thermal insulation) are required. Properties of these structures are strongly dependent on the general geometry of the sandwich, but also on the detailed patterns of matter partitioning within the core. Therefore it seems possible to tailor the core pattern in order to obtain the desired properties. But multi-functional specifications and the infinite number of possible shapes, leads to non-trivial selection and/or optimization problems. In this context of “material by design”, we propose a numerical approach, based on structural optimization techniques, to find the core pattern that leads to the best performances for a given set of conflicting specifications. The distribution of matter is defined thanks to a level-set function, and the convergence toward the optimized pattern is performed through the evolution of this function on a fixed grid. It is shown that the solutions of optimization are strongly dependent on the formulation of the problem, which have to be chosen with respect to the physics. A first application of this approach is presented for the design of sandwich core materials, in order to obtain the best compromise between flexural stiffness and relative density. The influence of both the initialization (starting geometry) and the formulation of the optimization problem are detailed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pollien, A., Conde, Y., Pambaguian, L. and Mortensen, A.. Graded open-cell aluminium foam core sandwich beams. Materials Science and Engineering A, 404, 918, (2005).10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.096Google Scholar
2 Lhuissier, P., Fallet, A., Salvo, L. and Brechet, Y.. Quasistatic mechanical behaviour of stainless steel hollow sphere foam: Macroscopic properties and damage mechanisms followed by X-ray tomography. Materials Letters, 63, 11131116, (2009).10.1016/j.matlet.2008.10.051Google Scholar
3 Queheillalt, D. T. and Wadley, H. N. G.. Cellular metal lattices with hollow trusses. Acta Materialia, 53, 303313, (2005).10.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.024Google Scholar
4 Wadley, H. N. G., Fleck, N. A. and Evans, A. G.. Fabrication and structural performance of periodic cellular metal sandwich structures. Comp. Sc. and Tech., 63, 23312343, (2003).10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00266-5Google Scholar
5 Ashby, M. F., and Brechet, Y. J. M.. Designing hybrid materials. Acta Materialia, 51, 58015821, (2003).10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00441-5Google Scholar
6 Allaire, G., Jouve, F. and Toader, A. M.. Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. Journal of Computational Physics, 194, 363393, (2004).10.1016/j.jcp.2003.09.032Google Scholar
7 Buannic, N., Cartraud, P. and Quesnel, T.. Homogenization of corrugated core sandwich panels. Composite structures, 59, 299312, (2003).10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00246-5Google Scholar
8 Eschenauer, H. A., and Olhoff, N.. Topology optimization of continuum structures: a review. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 54, 331390, (2001).10.1115/1.1388075Google Scholar