Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:22:02.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crack-free III-nitride structures (> 3.5 μm) on silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2011

Mihir Tungare
Affiliation:
College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY 12203, U.S.A.
Jeffrey M. Leathersich
Affiliation:
College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY 12203, U.S.A.
Neeraj Tripathi
Affiliation:
College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY 12203, U.S.A.
Puneet Suvarna
Affiliation:
College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY 12203, U.S.A.
Fatemeh (Shadi) Shahedipour-Sandvik
Affiliation:
College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY 12203, U.S.A.
Timothy A. Walsh
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
Randy P. Tompkins
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
Kenneth A. Jones
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

III-nitride structures on Si are of great technological importance due to the availability of large area, epi ready Si substrates and the ability to heterointegrate with mature silicon micro and nanoelectronics. High voltage, high power density, and high frequency attributes of GaN make the III-N on Si platform the most promising technology for next-generation power devices. However, the large lattice and thermal mismatch between GaN and Si (111) introduces a large density of dislocations and cracks in the epilayer. Cracking occurs along three equivalent {1−100} planes which limits the useable device area. Hence, efforts to obtain crack-free GaN on Si have been put forth with the most commonly reported technique being the insertion of low temperature (LT) AlN interlayers. However, these layers tend to further degrade the quality of the devices due to the poor quality of films grown at a lower temperature using metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). Our substrate engineering technique shows a considerable improvement in the quality of 2 μm thick GaN on Si (111), with a simultaneous decrease in dislocations and cracks. Dislocation reduction by an order of magnitude and crack separation of > 1 mm has been achieved. Here we combine our method with step-graded AlGaN layers and LT AlN interlayers to obtain crack-free structures greater than 3.5 μm on 2” Si (111) substrates. A comparison of these film stacks before and after substrate engineering is done using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and optical microscopy. High electron mobility transistor (HEMT) devices developed on a systematic set of samples are tested to understand the effects of our technique in combination with crack reduction techniques. Although there is degradation in the quality upon the insertion of LT AlN interlayers, this degradation is less prominent in the stack grown on the engineered substrates. Also, this methodology enables a crack-free surface with the capability of growing thicker layers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Okada, Y. and Tokumaru, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 56 314 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Maruska, H. P. and Tietjen, J. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 15 327 (1969).Google Scholar
3. Jothilingam, R., Koch, M. W., Posthill, J. B., and Wicks, G. W., J. Electron. Mater. 30 821 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Krost, A. and Dadgar, A., Mater. Sci. Eng., B93 77 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Reiher, A., Blasing, J., Dadgar, A., Diez, A., and Krost, A., J. Cryst. Growth, 248 563 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Feltin, E., Beaumont, B., Laugt, M., Mierry, P. d., Vennegues, P., Lahreche, H., Leroux, M., and Gibart, P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 79, 3230 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Jang, S. and Lee, C., J. Cryst. Growth 253, 64 (2003).Google Scholar
8. Able, A., Wegscheider, W., Engl, K., and Zweck, J., J. Cryst. Growth 276, 415 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Jamil, M., Grandusky, J. R., Jindal, V., Shahedipour-Sandvik, F., Guha, S., and Arif, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 82103 (2005).Google Scholar
10. Jamil, M., Grandusky, J. R., Jindal, V., Tripathi, N., and Shahedipour-Sandvik, F., J. Appl. Phys. 102, 023701 (2007).Google Scholar
11. Tungare, M., Kamineni, V. K., Shahedipour-Sandvik, F., and Diebold, A. C., Thin Solid Films 519, 2929 (2011).Google Scholar
12. Reshchikov, M. A. and Morkoc, H., J. Appl. Phys. 97, 061301 (2005).Google Scholar
13. GuoJian, D., LiWei, G., ZhiGang, X., Yao, C., PeiQiang, X., HaiQiang, J., JunMing, Z., and Hong, C., Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 53, 49 (2010).Google Scholar