Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:19:09.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compositional Mapping of Metal Films by Friction Force Microscopy and Force Modulation Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Shin-ichi Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Evaluation and Analysis Department ULSI Process Technology Development Center, Semiconductor Group Matsushita Electronics Corporation, 19 Nishikujo-Kasugacho, Minami-ku, Kyoto 601-8413, Japan Department of Electronics Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
Hirofumi Yamada
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
Kazumi Matsushige
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The characterization of metallic electrodes in semiconducting devices with high spacial resolution has become increasingly important. Scanning force microscopy (SFM) enables us to observe surface topographies on a nanometer scale as well as local mechanical properties such as friction force without any spacial surface treatment, while it is difficult to obtain high resolution with the conventional methods such as static time of flight-secondary ion mass spectroscopy and Auger electron spectroscopy because of their beam size. Here we have demonstrated the possibility of two dimensional mapping of the mechanical properties by friction force microscopy (FFM) and force modulation method (FMM) for Gold islands deposited on Nickel flat substrate. The FFM observation revealed that the grain size of the metallic islands ranged from 5 to 7000 nm. The friction force measurement showed that the friction force on Au islands was lower than the Ni substrate. The compositional high resolution mapping of metal films was obtained by FFM. In addition to the local mechanical measurement, FMM also showed the difference in stiffness between two materials.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Binnig, G., Rohrer, H., Gerber, Ch. and Weibel, E.: Phys: Rev. Lett. 49, 57 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Binnig, G., Quate, C.F. and Gerber, Ch.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Overney, R.M., Meyer, E., Frommer, J., Guntherodt, H.-J., Fujihira, M., Takano, H., and Gotoh, Y.: Langmuir 10, 1281(1994)Google Scholar
4. Mayer, E., Overney, R. M., Luthi, R., Brodbeck, D., Howald, L., Frommer, J., Guntherodt, H.-J., Wolter, O., Fujihira, M., Takano, H. and Gotoh, Y., Thin Solid Films, 220, 132 (1992)Google Scholar
5. Kajiyama, T., Tanaka, K., Ohki, I., Ge, S-R., Yoon, J-S. and Takahasi, A., Macromolecules, 27, 7932 (1994)Google Scholar
6. Yamamoto, S-I., Ishida, T., Mizutani, W., Tokumoto, H. and Yamada, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 3868 (1997)Google Scholar
7. Yamamoto, S-I. and Yamada, H., Langmuir 13, 4861 (1997)Google Scholar
8. Meyer, G. and Amer, N., Appl. Phys. Lett., 57, 2089 (1990)Google Scholar
9. Yamamoto, S., Yamada, H., Motomatsu, M., and Tokumoto, H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 436, 385 (1997)Google Scholar
10. Gray, D. E., American Institute of Physics Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1981 Google Scholar
11. Johnson, K. L., Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.Google Scholar