Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:19:31.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical and Electrical Characterization of the CoGa/GaAs Interface as A Function of Temperature: A Thermally Stable Schottky Barrier up to 500°C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

A. Alec Talin ,
Tue Ngo  and
R. Stanley Williams
A. Alec Talin
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry/Solid State Science Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024–1569
Tue Ngo
Affiliation:
Department of Physics/Solid State Science Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024
R. Stanley Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry/Solid State Science Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024–1569
Get access

Abstract

X-ray diffraction studies and current-voltage measurements have been performed on a (100) oriented single crystal thin film of CoxGa1-x (x = 0.42) grown epitaxially on n-GaAs, from 300°C to 900°C. At this composition, CoxGa1-x, which has a broad range of homogeneity and a variable lattice parameter, is lattice matched to GaAs better than 0.5%. A Schottky barrier height of 0.68eV and an ideality factor of 1.07 have been measured up to 500°C, with significant barrier degradation at 600°C. At 700°C formation of the CoGa3 phase and a shift in CoxGa1-x stoichiometry to its bulk thermodynamically most stable composition of Co.45Ga.55 was observed with x-ray diffraction. At 800°C Co2AS formed, and at 900°C only CoGa3 and Co2As phases remained in contact with GaAs.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 260: Symposium C – Advanced Metallization and Processing for Semiconductor Devices and Circuits , 1992 , 505
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Rhoderick, E. H. and Williams, R. H., Metal-Semiconductor Contacts, 2nd ed. (Oxford University, Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
[2] Schubert, K., Lukas, H. L., Meissner, H. G., and Bhan, S., Z. Metallkinde. 50, 534 (1959).Google Scholar
[3] Palmstrom, C. J., Finland, B. O., Sands, T., Garrison, K. C., and Bartynski, R. A., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 4753 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Baugh, D. A., Talin, A. A., Williams, R. S., Kuo, T. C., Wang, K. L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9 (4), 2154 (1991).Google Scholar
[5] Kim, Y. K., Ph. D thesis, UCLA (1991)Google Scholar
[6] Henig, E., Lukes, H. L. and Petzow, G., Z. Metallkinde, 23, 87 (1982)Google Scholar
[7] Kuo, T. C., Wang, K. L., Arghavani, R., George, T. and Lin, T. L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., (in press).Google Scholar
[8] Mauri, F., Talin, A. A., Kaesz, H. D., and Williams, R. S., (unpublished).Google Scholar