Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:33:28.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbon Nanoparticles for Counter Electrode Catalyst in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Prakash Joshi
Affiliation:
[email protected], South Dakota State University, Center for Advanced Photovoltaics, Department of Electrical Engineering, 201 Harding Hall, Brookings, SD, 57007, United States
Yu Xie
Affiliation:
[email protected], South Dakota State University, Center for Advanced Photovoltaics, Department of Electrical Engineering, 201 Harding Hall, Brookings, SD, 57007, United States
Jeremiah Mwaura
Affiliation:
[email protected], Konarka Technologies, Lowell, MA, 01852, United States
Mike Ropp
Affiliation:
[email protected], South Dakota State University, Center for Advanced Photovoltaics, Department of Electrical Engineering, 201 Harding Hall, Brookings, SD, 57007, United States
David Galipeau
Affiliation:
[email protected], South Dakota State University, Center for Advanced Photovoltaics, Department of Electrical Engineering, 201 Harding Hall, Brookings, SD, 57007, United States
Qiquan Qiao
Affiliation:
[email protected], South Dakota State University, Center for Advanced Photovoltaics, Department of Electrical Engineering, 201 Harding Hall, Brookings, SD, 57007, United States
Get access

Abstract

We report dye-sensitized solar cells using low cost carbon nanoparticles as an alternative to platinum as a counter-electrode catalyst for triiodide reduction. The counter carbon-electrode was deposited onto fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) by spin coating from an aqueous colloidal suspension of the blend of carbon nanoparticles and TiO2 nanocrystals. DSSC devices were fabricated using a stable Ru complex dye (Z-907) as the sensitizer. The cells based on carbon-nanoparticle counter electrode were made and then compared with those cells from platinum counter electrode at similar fabrication conditions. The results have shown that the device performance in terms of short circuit current density (Jsc), open circuit voltage (Voc) and energy conversion efficiency (η) from the cells based on carbon nanoparticle counter electrode were comparable to those from platinum counter-electrode devices. The carbon nanoparticle based cells have achieved an overall energy conversion efficiency of 5.55% under one sun AM 1.5 illumination (100 mW/cm2). The carbon nanoparticles showed significant potential as a low cost alternative to the current widely-used platinum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1 Kamat, P. V. Meeting the Clean Energy Demand: Nanostructure Architectures for Solar Energy Conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 2834, (2007).Google Scholar
2 Xie, Y. Joshi, P. Ropp, M. Galipeau, D. You, Y. and Qiao, Q.. Core-Modified Porphyrins as Sensitizers for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. in 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference. 2008. San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
3 Xie, Y. Li, S. Zhang, T. Joshi, P. Fong, H. Ropp, M. Galipeau, D. and Qiao, Q.. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells based on ZnO Nanorod Arrays. in Photonic Devices and Applications, part of Optics+Photonics 2008. 2008. San Diego, California, USA.Google Scholar
4 Oregan, B. and Gratzel, M. A Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar-Cell Based on Dye-Sensitized Colloidal Tio2 Films. Nature 353, 737, (1991).Google Scholar
5 Gratzel, M. Sol-gel processed TiO2 films for photovoltaic applications. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 22, 7, (2001).Google Scholar
6 Gregg, B. A. Zaban, A. and Ferrere, S. Dye sensitized solar cells: Energetic considerations and applications. Z. Phys. Chemie-Int. J. Res. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 212, 11, (1999).Google Scholar
7 Smestad, G. P. Dye sensitized and organic solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 76, 1, (2003).10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00246-5Google Scholar
8 Nelson, J. Haque, S. A. Klug, D. R. and Durrant, J. R. Trap-limited recombination in dyesensitized nanocrystalline metal oxide electrodes. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 63, 205321, (2001).Google Scholar
9 Nazeeruddin, M. K. Zakeeruddin, S. M. Lagref, J. J. Liska, P. Comte, P. Barolo, C. Viscardi, G., Schenk, K. and Graetzel, M. Stepwise assembly of amphiphilic ruthenium sensitizers and their applications in dye-sensitized solar cell. Coord. Chem. Rev. 248, 1317, (2004).Google Scholar
10 O'Regan, B., Schwartz, D. T. Zakeeruddin, S. M. and Gratzel, M. Electrodeposited nanocomposite n-p heterojunctions for solid-state dye-sensitized photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. 12, 1263, (2000).Google Scholar
11 O'Regan, B., Sklover, V. and Gratzel, M. Electrochemical deposition of smooth and homogeneously mesoporous ZnO films from propylene carbonate electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 148, C498, (2001).Google Scholar
12 Grätzel, M. and McEvoy, A.J., Principles and Applications of Dye Sensitized Nanocrystalline Solar Cellls (DSC). http://photochemistry.epfl.ch/EDEY/AJEE.pdf.Google Scholar
13 Easwaramoorthi, R. Jae, L. Won, Yoon, L. Dong, and Sung, S. Jae, Nanocarbon counterelectrode for dye sensitized solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 173103, (2007).Google Scholar
14 Kroon, J. M. Bakker, N. J. Smit, H. J. P., Liska, P. Thampi, K. R. Wang, P. Zakeeruddin, S. M., Grätzel, M., Hinsch, A. Hore, S. Würfel, U., Sastrawan, R. Durrant, J. R. Palomares, E., Pettersson, H. Gruszecki, T. Walter, J. Skupien, K. and Tulloch, G. E. Nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cells having maximum performance. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 15, 1, (2007).Google Scholar
15 Matsubara, T. Sakaguchi, R. Nagai, H. Aramaki, K. and Katagiri, A. Measurement and Analysis of the Series Resistance in a Dye-sensitized Solar Cell. Electrochem. 73, 60, (2005).Google Scholar
16 Hart, J. N. Menzies, D. Cheng, Y.-B., Simon, G. P. and Spiccia, L. TiO2 sol-gel blocking layers for dye-sensitized solar cells. C. R. Chim. 9, 622, (2006).Google Scholar