Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:34:21.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of Shielding Material Performance for Deep Space Missions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

L. K. Mansur ,
B. J. Frame ,
N. C. Gallego ,
S. B. Guetersloh ,
J. O. Johnson ,
J. W. Klett  and
L. W. Townsend
L. K. Mansur
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6138, USA
B. J. Frame
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6138, USA
N. C. Gallego
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6138, USA
S. B. Guetersloh
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
J. O. Johnson
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6138, USA
J. W. Klett
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6138, USA
L. W. Townsend
Affiliation:
Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996–2300, USA
Get access

Abstract

Radiation doses from galactic cosmic rays (GCR) are a significant issue for spacecraft crew exposures in deep space. We report initial work to evaluate a range of materials for GCR shielding. Earlier work has shown that conventional spacecraft materials, aluminum and higher atomic number structural alloys, provide relatively little shielding and, under certain conditions, may increase radiation risk. Materials containing high proportions of hydrogen and other low atomic mass nuclei provide improved GCR shielding. Polyethylene (PE) is generally considered a good performance benchmark shield material. However, PE shielding occupies volume and adds mass to the spacecraft. In this work we investigate several materials that are shown to provide shielding similar to PE, but which could furnish additional spacecraft functions, possibly eliminating the need for materials currently used for structural support or thermal management. Carbon forms that can incorporate a large mass of hydrogen, as well as polymers and polymer composites are being explored. Calculations of shielding effectiveness in GCR spectra have been carried out. Experiments to measure shielding properties recently have been completed at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) located at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) using high energy beans of O16. In this paper we report preliminary shielding results.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 851: Symposium NN – Materials for Space Applications , 2004 , NN8.10
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Townsend, L. W., Nealy, J. E., Wilson, J. W., and Simonsen, L. C., “Estimates of Galactic Cosmic Ray Shielding Requirements During Solar Minimum,” NASA Technical Memorandum 4167, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1990.Google Scholar
2. Schimmerling, W., et al., Adv. Space Res. 17, (2)31-(2)36 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Wilson, J. W., et al., Acta Astronautica 49, 289–312 (2001).Google Scholar
4. “Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection,” Annals of the ICRP, Publication 60 (Pergamon Press, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
5. Mansur, L. K. and Farrell, K., J. Nucl. Mater. 244, 212–218 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Burchell, T. D., Howe, J., Gabbard, A., and Rogers, M., “Adsorbent carbon fiber composites for the storage of natural gas,” 48th International SAMPE Symposium 48: 1855ss (2003)Google Scholar
7. Burchell, T. D., Judkins, R. R., Rogers, M., Williams, A. M., Carbon 35, 1279–1294 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Klett, J., Hardy, R., Romine, E., Walls, C., Burchell, T., Carbon 38, 953–973 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Townsend, L. W., Cucinotta, F. A., and Wilson, J. W., Radiat. Res. 129, 48–52, (January 1992).Google Scholar
10. Miller, J., et al., Radiation Research 159, 381–390 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Mansur, L. K., et al., in preparation.Google Scholar